This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hemoptysis.
|
I think that the graphic should be transcribed by somebody who understands it, so that the text is searchable and has appropriate links. Will add wikify tag to section. -- Storkk 11:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
The graph is an image while it may be helpful to include some of the flow in the text, I don't think that qualifies as needing to be wikified. I am removing the wikify tag Jeepday 21:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The article listed the most common cause of hemoptysis as lung neoplasm, however, most studies list acute or chronic bronchitis as the most common cause of hemoptysis.
The entire "Diagnostic approach" section seems to be lifted from here: http://tomi-md.com/2010/03/coughing-blood-hemoptysis/ I'm in the process of rewriting it to remove the offending material -- JaymesKeller ( talk) 08:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Cardiac causes like congestive heart failure and mitral stenosis should be ruled out contains an odd choice of modal verb. Should be - Is this a statement or an instruction? (i.e. is should being used deontically or epistemically?) Someone who understands the purpose of this sentence could perhaps paraphrase it into something less cryptic. C0pernicus ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.41 JFW | T@lk 11:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The caption of the radiology photo reads "Hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology." Shouldn't this say, "The cause of hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.137.128.43 ( talk) 12:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hemoptysis.
|
I think that the graphic should be transcribed by somebody who understands it, so that the text is searchable and has appropriate links. Will add wikify tag to section. -- Storkk 11:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
The graph is an image while it may be helpful to include some of the flow in the text, I don't think that qualifies as needing to be wikified. I am removing the wikify tag Jeepday 21:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The article listed the most common cause of hemoptysis as lung neoplasm, however, most studies list acute or chronic bronchitis as the most common cause of hemoptysis.
The entire "Diagnostic approach" section seems to be lifted from here: http://tomi-md.com/2010/03/coughing-blood-hemoptysis/ I'm in the process of rewriting it to remove the offending material -- JaymesKeller ( talk) 08:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Cardiac causes like congestive heart failure and mitral stenosis should be ruled out contains an odd choice of modal verb. Should be - Is this a statement or an instruction? (i.e. is should being used deontically or epistemically?) Someone who understands the purpose of this sentence could perhaps paraphrase it into something less cryptic. C0pernicus ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.41 JFW | T@lk 11:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The caption of the radiology photo reads "Hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology." Shouldn't this say, "The cause of hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.137.128.43 ( talk) 12:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)