![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Heller House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 29, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
Heller House marked a turning point in
Frank Lloyd Wright's shift to
Prairie School architecture? |
More to come, hopefully. IvoShandor 02:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I want to bring into question the accuracy of the official Chicago Landmarks site on such items as date of designation. A Chicago Tribune article dated February 7, 1960 indicated that the Heller House was designated a Chicago Landmark long before the date claimed by the official website of September 15, 1971. I would lean toward the Trib's date, as there is no indication that the government site has been vetted for accuracy. IvoShandor 03:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, first note that I am not a seasoned GA reviewer--however, I nominated an article for GA and saw that it was requested that those who nominate an article then review one, which I am doing. So, if you disagree with my remarks feel free to consult a second opinion (you won't hurt my feelings...) Anyway...
I have placed this article on hold for 7 days in order that the following points be addressed. If rectified, the article will pass.
Generally, the article is well done and I commend all of the work that went into it, especially a lot of the research which is in-depth and descriptive (and I imagine took a significant amount of time). Lazulilasher
The Review:
( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 22:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
and
Comments:
Which Silver Lake does the article refer to?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I have gone through almost all of this article and have re-arranged things, added references, fixed some links and corrected grammar. I have not done everything, but nobody's perfect... :) -- andreasegde ( talk) 16:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 30, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
This article has seen some improvement in the past few days, most notably from TonyTheTiger and Andreasegde. It definitely now passes as a Good Article under all criteria, as it 1.) does not skip over any significant details 2.) is informative 3.) no copyright vios and 4.) NPOV. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Lazulilasher ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I am just removing this bit of information. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant, it has to be verifiable from a published source. Per wiki policies on original research, and verifiability, I am removing this. IvoShandor ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Heller House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/il/Heller.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Heller House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 29, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
Heller House marked a turning point in
Frank Lloyd Wright's shift to
Prairie School architecture? |
More to come, hopefully. IvoShandor 02:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I want to bring into question the accuracy of the official Chicago Landmarks site on such items as date of designation. A Chicago Tribune article dated February 7, 1960 indicated that the Heller House was designated a Chicago Landmark long before the date claimed by the official website of September 15, 1971. I would lean toward the Trib's date, as there is no indication that the government site has been vetted for accuracy. IvoShandor 03:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, first note that I am not a seasoned GA reviewer--however, I nominated an article for GA and saw that it was requested that those who nominate an article then review one, which I am doing. So, if you disagree with my remarks feel free to consult a second opinion (you won't hurt my feelings...) Anyway...
I have placed this article on hold for 7 days in order that the following points be addressed. If rectified, the article will pass.
Generally, the article is well done and I commend all of the work that went into it, especially a lot of the research which is in-depth and descriptive (and I imagine took a significant amount of time). Lazulilasher
The Review:
( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 22:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
and
Comments:
Which Silver Lake does the article refer to?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I have gone through almost all of this article and have re-arranged things, added references, fixed some links and corrected grammar. I have not done everything, but nobody's perfect... :) -- andreasegde ( talk) 16:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 30, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
This article has seen some improvement in the past few days, most notably from TonyTheTiger and Andreasegde. It definitely now passes as a Good Article under all criteria, as it 1.) does not skip over any significant details 2.) is informative 3.) no copyright vios and 4.) NPOV. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Lazulilasher ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I am just removing this bit of information. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant, it has to be verifiable from a published source. Per wiki policies on original research, and verifiability, I am removing this. IvoShandor ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Heller House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/il/Heller.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)