I do not think that this article passes the good article criteria; specifically, criteria 1a, 3 and 4:
- Criteria 1a: A word count of around 760 words for 22 minutes is way above acceptable limits.
- Criteria 3: The article lacks a "production" section. Most episodes have three major components—plot, production, review. This article lacks one of these, and is, as such, not comprehensive enough to be a good article.
- Criteria 4: This article contains a controversy section which only characterises one side of the dispute. Thus, it fails the neutrality criterion.
As the article is fundamentally flawed, I've delisted this as a good article. Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 02:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I do not think that this article passes the good article criteria; specifically, criteria 1a, 3 and 4:
- Criteria 1a: A word count of around 760 words for 22 minutes is way above acceptable limits.
- Criteria 3: The article lacks a "production" section. Most episodes have three major components—plot, production, review. This article lacks one of these, and is, as such, not comprehensive enough to be a good article.
- Criteria 4: This article contains a controversy section which only characterises one side of the dispute. Thus, it fails the neutrality criterion.
As the article is fundamentally flawed, I've delisted this as a good article. Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 02:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)