From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reverting productive edits

It improves the page, there is no harm in it, there is no reason to revert it, it's a productive edit yet it's getting reverted in a destructive manner. Why are there Wikidata templates if it's not allowed to use them then? The page linked says this "The choice to use this information is left entirely to the Wikipedia community itself", also it fixes birth name and also you revert destroy other minor addition in my edit in the meantime. If there is no consensus you shouldn't act like there is consensus to disallow them. Tehonk ( talk) 17:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reverting productive edits

It improves the page, there is no harm in it, there is no reason to revert it, it's a productive edit yet it's getting reverted in a destructive manner. Why are there Wikidata templates if it's not allowed to use them then? The page linked says this "The choice to use this information is left entirely to the Wikipedia community itself", also it fixes birth name and also you revert destroy other minor addition in my edit in the meantime. If there is no consensus you shouldn't act like there is consensus to disallow them. Tehonk ( talk) 17:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook