![]() | A fact from Held v. Montana appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 July 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Edge3 (
talk)
03:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by RCraig09 ( talk), Oltrepier ( talk), and Czar ( talk). Nominated by RCraig09 ( talk) at 20:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Held v. Montana; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
@ Oltrepier: Your 2000-byte edit was not "few further adjustments". Please make edits incrementally, rather than making large numbers of mutually unrelated edits, so that changes are easier for other editors to review. Usually, add content from one reference at a time, and separate formal/wording changes in their own edits, maybe separately for each section of an article. (I realize I myself made some major edits on 21 June, but they all related to a single issue raised at DYK.) Thanks. — RCraig09 ( talk) 15:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
... and as a practical matter, long edits take a long time, making an WP:Edit conflict more likely, necessitating some hairy sorting out by at least one of the editors involved. — RCraig09 ( talk) 17:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
<ref name=xxx/>
in the wikitext (must include the slash "/"). More generally, in the source editor: above the big edit box, there are a few choices ">Advanced >Specialcharacters >Help >Cite". Be sure ">Cite" is chosen, and then click on "Templates" at the left and choose from the drop-down list. When the window appears, click "Show/hide extra fields", which will allow you to add archive links. Archive links are formed in the
Wayback Machine at
archive.org (paste the URL of the news or magazine article there to find an existing archive link, or form a new archive link if needed). Including archive links avoids
WP:Link rot. —
RCraig09 (
talk)
12:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
The hook for this court case is featured in the Did you know... section of Wikipedia's splash page as of this date and time. The nominating process is recorded at Template:Did you know nominations/Held v. Montana. — RCraig09 ( talk) 02:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
At the start of the article, we note the MEPA acronym for Montana Environmental Policy Act. Then later we use the MEPA acronym for Montana Energy Policy Act.
I thought this might be a simple mistake of the editor but the cited reference says Montana Energy Policy Act. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/montana-youth-climate-plaintiffs-get-historic-win-in-state-case
Sorry I am relatively new to Wikipedia. What do we do here? I don't see any existence of a Montana Energy Policy Act so I am assuming the cited source made a typo. YordleSquire ( talk) 19:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Taking a look at a document the cited references links to.
See second page: it seems like there is a Montana State Energy Policy Act which is something different from Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). YordleSquire ( talk) 19:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Or rather the State Energy Policy Act is a provision of the broader act MEPA? YordleSquire ( talk) 19:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, the language is a bit confusing.
And I'm trying not to delve into original research. YordleSquire ( talk) 19:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I streamlined that section and sidestepped this issue... YordleSquire ( talk) 19:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
(Presented here, to make further study easier.) —
RCraig09 (
talk)
22:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC))
![]() | A fact from Held v. Montana appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 July 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Edge3 (
talk)
03:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by RCraig09 ( talk), Oltrepier ( talk), and Czar ( talk). Nominated by RCraig09 ( talk) at 20:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Held v. Montana; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
@ Oltrepier: Your 2000-byte edit was not "few further adjustments". Please make edits incrementally, rather than making large numbers of mutually unrelated edits, so that changes are easier for other editors to review. Usually, add content from one reference at a time, and separate formal/wording changes in their own edits, maybe separately for each section of an article. (I realize I myself made some major edits on 21 June, but they all related to a single issue raised at DYK.) Thanks. — RCraig09 ( talk) 15:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
... and as a practical matter, long edits take a long time, making an WP:Edit conflict more likely, necessitating some hairy sorting out by at least one of the editors involved. — RCraig09 ( talk) 17:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
<ref name=xxx/>
in the wikitext (must include the slash "/"). More generally, in the source editor: above the big edit box, there are a few choices ">Advanced >Specialcharacters >Help >Cite". Be sure ">Cite" is chosen, and then click on "Templates" at the left and choose from the drop-down list. When the window appears, click "Show/hide extra fields", which will allow you to add archive links. Archive links are formed in the
Wayback Machine at
archive.org (paste the URL of the news or magazine article there to find an existing archive link, or form a new archive link if needed). Including archive links avoids
WP:Link rot. —
RCraig09 (
talk)
12:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
The hook for this court case is featured in the Did you know... section of Wikipedia's splash page as of this date and time. The nominating process is recorded at Template:Did you know nominations/Held v. Montana. — RCraig09 ( talk) 02:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
At the start of the article, we note the MEPA acronym for Montana Environmental Policy Act. Then later we use the MEPA acronym for Montana Energy Policy Act.
I thought this might be a simple mistake of the editor but the cited reference says Montana Energy Policy Act. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/montana-youth-climate-plaintiffs-get-historic-win-in-state-case
Sorry I am relatively new to Wikipedia. What do we do here? I don't see any existence of a Montana Energy Policy Act so I am assuming the cited source made a typo. YordleSquire ( talk) 19:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Taking a look at a document the cited references links to.
See second page: it seems like there is a Montana State Energy Policy Act which is something different from Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). YordleSquire ( talk) 19:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Or rather the State Energy Policy Act is a provision of the broader act MEPA? YordleSquire ( talk) 19:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, the language is a bit confusing.
And I'm trying not to delve into original research. YordleSquire ( talk) 19:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I streamlined that section and sidestepped this issue... YordleSquire ( talk) 19:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
(Presented here, to make further study easier.) —
RCraig09 (
talk)
22:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC))