This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Beyoncé, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Beyoncé on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeyoncéWikipedia:WikiProject BeyoncéTemplate:WikiProject BeyoncéBeyoncé articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I could see the EP being merged with the fragrance if it doesn't gain much more attention, but I think that the song should definitely be merged to the original.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
07:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
But the difference here is that Beyonce recorded the song for the fragrance. I mean she did it for a purpose which was to promote the fragrance.
Jivesh •
Talk2Me07:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Adabow, my point is that when the song will be merged to the original, you will definitely have to mention over there that beyonce recorded it for her fragrance. The video also shows her fragrance Heat. I mean the song is entirely connected to it. That's why i thought that it would be better to merge it with the fragrance's article.
Jivesh •
Talk2Me07:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Support merging I don't support merging with the fragrance article. Heat may be merged with the fragrance article, but not the song. Why merge the song article with the fragrance one when there is an article on the song?
Novice7 (
talk)
09:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
So without taking this much further, since I technically created the article, can i just take this discussion and move Fever (Beyonce Knowles song) to the original Fever page? Or do i have to wait for this discussion to be officially over???
Theuhohreo (
talk)
16:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral Even it is a cover, someday someone from Madonna wikiproject (Legolas) or someone from Knowles wikiproject will clean up the page and it will be alot of information. Little Willie John version currenlty is missing many information, Madonna version as well, the other notable covers too, so if you believe it would be OK to have a >200Kb page, merge it.
Tbhotch* ۩۞00:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
That is a very good point – I hadn't thought of that. The original and Madonna's version were both released as singles (maybe others' too), so it will be quite heavy. I wonder if we merge for now, and if the article gets too big we can split off a section (Madonna?) or two.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
08:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Merge song with song and fragrance with EP - First of all, there is no reason why the song should not be under John's song. Madonna's is far more notable, as well as the fact that several very popular covers still don't have their own page. I say to merge the EP with the fragrance, and then merge the song to the Willie song, having only a small subsection for it in the EP.--
CallMeNathan •
Talk2Me07:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Beyoncé, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Beyoncé on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeyoncéWikipedia:WikiProject BeyoncéTemplate:WikiProject BeyoncéBeyoncé articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I could see the EP being merged with the fragrance if it doesn't gain much more attention, but I think that the song should definitely be merged to the original.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
07:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
But the difference here is that Beyonce recorded the song for the fragrance. I mean she did it for a purpose which was to promote the fragrance.
Jivesh •
Talk2Me07:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Adabow, my point is that when the song will be merged to the original, you will definitely have to mention over there that beyonce recorded it for her fragrance. The video also shows her fragrance Heat. I mean the song is entirely connected to it. That's why i thought that it would be better to merge it with the fragrance's article.
Jivesh •
Talk2Me07:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Support merging I don't support merging with the fragrance article. Heat may be merged with the fragrance article, but not the song. Why merge the song article with the fragrance one when there is an article on the song?
Novice7 (
talk)
09:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
So without taking this much further, since I technically created the article, can i just take this discussion and move Fever (Beyonce Knowles song) to the original Fever page? Or do i have to wait for this discussion to be officially over???
Theuhohreo (
talk)
16:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral Even it is a cover, someday someone from Madonna wikiproject (Legolas) or someone from Knowles wikiproject will clean up the page and it will be alot of information. Little Willie John version currenlty is missing many information, Madonna version as well, the other notable covers too, so if you believe it would be OK to have a >200Kb page, merge it.
Tbhotch* ۩۞00:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
That is a very good point – I hadn't thought of that. The original and Madonna's version were both released as singles (maybe others' too), so it will be quite heavy. I wonder if we merge for now, and if the article gets too big we can split off a section (Madonna?) or two.
Adabow (
talk ·
contribs)
08:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Merge song with song and fragrance with EP - First of all, there is no reason why the song should not be under John's song. Madonna's is far more notable, as well as the fact that several very popular covers still don't have their own page. I say to merge the EP with the fragrance, and then merge the song to the Willie song, having only a small subsection for it in the EP.--
CallMeNathan •
Talk2Me07:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.