A fact from Heat-pipe tectonics appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 January 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JacqCLSin ( talk) 18:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation from Alex:
-- Alexnlk ( talk) 12:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation: 1. More elaboration can be made on the 4 methods to build up the internal energy in the "hypothesis" section, e.g: by what impacts can the accumulation be made? how is the metallic core formed? the mechanism of nuclear decay? how is the tidal heat generated? 2. It would better summarize the observation on Io into bullet points i.e. 1. extraordinary large surface heat flux 2. high relief 3. silicate magma 3. hyperlinks can be made on the words in the introduction so that readers can view the prefered content more conveniently. For example, hyperlink can be used for the word "heat-pipe Earth hypothesis" so readers can be directed to the heat-pipe Earth hypothesis section. -- Charlespsml ( talk) 13:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation from Abraham
-- AMLSIU ( talk) 12:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
JacqCLSin ( talk) 18:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Comments from Yansy
1. English can be improved, especially for the use of articles and words. E.g. No tectonism before 3.2 billion years ago. -> There is no tectonism 3.2 billion years ago. Also, some words are not consistent in terms of capitalization, like "Earth".
2. The figures are simple and easy to understand!
3. You may consider adding a line or two about the importance of studying the heat-pipe tectonics in the introduction to arouse the audience's interest.
4. Maybe the figures can be placed horizontally under the "Theory" section. I thought the figure next to the section about Io is about Io but actually it's related to the fundamental concepts of the theory.
A fact from Heat-pipe tectonics appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 January 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JacqCLSin ( talk) 18:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation from Alex:
-- Alexnlk ( talk) 12:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation: 1. More elaboration can be made on the 4 methods to build up the internal energy in the "hypothesis" section, e.g: by what impacts can the accumulation be made? how is the metallic core formed? the mechanism of nuclear decay? how is the tidal heat generated? 2. It would better summarize the observation on Io into bullet points i.e. 1. extraordinary large surface heat flux 2. high relief 3. silicate magma 3. hyperlinks can be made on the words in the introduction so that readers can view the prefered content more conveniently. For example, hyperlink can be used for the word "heat-pipe Earth hypothesis" so readers can be directed to the heat-pipe Earth hypothesis section. -- Charlespsml ( talk) 13:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Recommendation from Abraham
-- AMLSIU ( talk) 12:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
JacqCLSin ( talk) 18:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Comments from Yansy
1. English can be improved, especially for the use of articles and words. E.g. No tectonism before 3.2 billion years ago. -> There is no tectonism 3.2 billion years ago. Also, some words are not consistent in terms of capitalization, like "Earth".
2. The figures are simple and easy to understand!
3. You may consider adding a line or two about the importance of studying the heat-pipe tectonics in the introduction to arouse the audience's interest.
4. Maybe the figures can be placed horizontally under the "Theory" section. I thought the figure next to the section about Io is about Io but actually it's related to the fundamental concepts of the theory.