Healing the man blind from birth is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Oh no, oh no. Will be an absolute nightmare and lightning may strike both of us blind. They should refer to each other, but as is, each one refers to a specific passage, and each miracle has a "separate clean page". This will create a confusing soup. We can, however, give a summary of all the blind ones as a paragraph in each article. Again, there are so many other articles that need help that this will be a distraction. I just found out about two nice new articles,
Suetonius on Christ and
Mara Bar-Serapion and they are not linked to from elsewhere, and need a few more refs, so that kind of work needs to come first, I think.
History2007 (
talk) 21:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Requested move 04 June 2014
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. This was requested as a
technical move, but since multiple options have been presented, I have moved it to a full discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Healing the man blind from birth is clunky, but it's the best of the three presented here so far. With a title like this, I would expect to find a medical procedure for curing infants born blind. Since the current title isn't too common anyway (see
"healing the blind at birth" -wikipedia), I would like to see incoming links updated and the current title deleted as a redirect after the move. --
BDD (
talk) 01:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Support Option 2
Healing the man blind from birth per print sources - as BDD says "
Healing the man blind from birth is clunky, but it's the best of the three presented here so far. With a title like this, I would expect to find a medical procedure for curing infants born blind." in fact was so unrecognizable that ignored this RM till it hit backlog.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 04:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Healing the man blind from birth is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Oh no, oh no. Will be an absolute nightmare and lightning may strike both of us blind. They should refer to each other, but as is, each one refers to a specific passage, and each miracle has a "separate clean page". This will create a confusing soup. We can, however, give a summary of all the blind ones as a paragraph in each article. Again, there are so many other articles that need help that this will be a distraction. I just found out about two nice new articles,
Suetonius on Christ and
Mara Bar-Serapion and they are not linked to from elsewhere, and need a few more refs, so that kind of work needs to come first, I think.
History2007 (
talk) 21:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Requested move 04 June 2014
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. This was requested as a
technical move, but since multiple options have been presented, I have moved it to a full discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Healing the man blind from birth is clunky, but it's the best of the three presented here so far. With a title like this, I would expect to find a medical procedure for curing infants born blind. Since the current title isn't too common anyway (see
"healing the blind at birth" -wikipedia), I would like to see incoming links updated and the current title deleted as a redirect after the move. --
BDD (
talk) 01:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Support Option 2
Healing the man blind from birth per print sources - as BDD says "
Healing the man blind from birth is clunky, but it's the best of the three presented here so far. With a title like this, I would expect to find a medical procedure for curing infants born blind." in fact was so unrecognizable that ignored this RM till it hit backlog.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 04:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.