From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charts

it's time for someone to add charts it's already #26 on UK Radio Airplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicesoldier ( talkcontribs) 17:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply

WTH Happened to the charts?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.201.206 ( talk) 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC) reply

"Friendship Never Ends"

It sounds to me as if they're referencing one of the lyrics from their breakout single, Wannabe. Leemorrison 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Victoria's Secret product placement

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berserkerz Crit ( talkcontribs) 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Unnecessary speculative information

The article contains a paragraph of unsubstantiated speculative information:

"The marketing strategy of the single was quite questionable, releasing the single in a 2-phase-process (first digital, 2 weeks prior to the physical). A united and sudden release may have charted better. The fact that no B-sides or remixes were available on the single and that the Greatest Hits album was released at the same time may have lowered the single's chart possibilities."

It carries the tone of a fansite's pathetic attempt at justifying the single's poor chart performance, and stands outside Wiki's policy of containing only FACTUAL and SOURCED information, both of which are missing in this instance. Who else agrees that this paragrah should be deleted? Reqluce ( talk) 01:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charts

it's time for someone to add charts it's already #26 on UK Radio Airplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicesoldier ( talkcontribs) 17:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply

WTH Happened to the charts?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.201.206 ( talk) 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC) reply

"Friendship Never Ends"

It sounds to me as if they're referencing one of the lyrics from their breakout single, Wannabe. Leemorrison 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Victoria's Secret product placement

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berserkerz Crit ( talkcontribs) 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Unnecessary speculative information

The article contains a paragraph of unsubstantiated speculative information:

"The marketing strategy of the single was quite questionable, releasing the single in a 2-phase-process (first digital, 2 weeks prior to the physical). A united and sudden release may have charted better. The fact that no B-sides or remixes were available on the single and that the Greatest Hits album was released at the same time may have lowered the single's chart possibilities."

It carries the tone of a fansite's pathetic attempt at justifying the single's poor chart performance, and stands outside Wiki's policy of containing only FACTUAL and SOURCED information, both of which are missing in this instance. Who else agrees that this paragrah should be deleted? Reqluce ( talk) 01:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook