![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
this article is a bit tilted (a definition, then an effectivity comparison, seems a bit like criticism... just a bit); but the information is correct, perhaps the article should be divided into sections.-- 164.77.109.210 08:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
The reason Head & Shoulders appears copper orange in the movie Evolution is because it is the intensive treatment formula. Rather than pyrithione zinc, it uses selenium sulfide for the active ingredient. Perhaps these two active ingredients should also be listed as such under the article ? 83.84.35.95 17:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
This page appears to be a clear breach of the usual conventions in that it is simply an advertisement board for Head and Shoulders and a range of other products
Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I believe for a time in the early-mid 1990s, Head and Shoulders sponsored NBC's NFL Live! postgame reports until the NFL Live moniker was dropped after the 1994 NFL season. WAVY 10 Fan ( talk) 20:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
This article claims H&S launched the world's first shampoo with zinc pyrithione. I found no links nor references to validate that, and a google search turned up fruitless. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Revlon's ZP-II pre-dates H&S.-- 99.231.196.195 ( talk) 01:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I've listened twice now and I swear that Head and Shoulders is saying that its "hair endurance" formula contains hydrazine? But look at the toxicity data as described in that article. I didn't think that sounded like a likely component for a hair care formula... Wnt ( talk) 00:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
In the UK now the shampoo is now available in seven different fragrances. So who says that capitalism doesn't produce any useful products? Smokey TheCat 19:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Head & Shoulders shampoo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Head & Shoulders shampoo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 02:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
The result of the move request was: speedy closed and not moved per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) -- Calidum 02:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Head & Shoulders →
Head & shoulders – Since the brand name is always lowercase, I believe that the page should be moved to
Head & shoulders per the article naming guidelines.
Gamebuster19901 (
talk)
14:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the information contained is quite objective: Description, some history, and ingredients. Nothing particularly promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.97.2 ( talk) 12:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
As mentioned above, this article was a brochure for the product, not an encyclopedia article. I merged it to the active ingredient and redirected this article and merged the content into the article on the active ingredient, which is what we generally do with promotional articles on specific brands of medicated products or drugs. User:BD2412 restored the article, and created a brief but very solid, and independently sourced encyclopedia article on the brand. I have no objections to this at all. Jytdog ( talk) 17:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
193.201.132.244 ( talk) 14:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC) [1]
I would like to show a list of all the celebrity endorsements and sponsorships carried out by the brand. I believe this is a part of the brand history and legacy. If it is relevant for sporting goods why not consumer goods? User jytdog deleted a list I painstakingly compiled citing the reason as Trivial - this classification is entirely subjective and lacks a thorough definition. looking at celebrity pages on wikipedia shows many such mentions of the celebrities appearing in commercials. it is often a breakthrough indicator of success for actors and sports people to be chosen as ambassadors.
exampleS: /info/en/?search=Emma_Forbes /info/en/?search=Troy_Polamalu /info/en/?search=Joey_Mead_King /info/en/?search=Roger_Tilling /info/en/?search=Georgina_Chapman /info/en/?search=Christian_Neal_Capes /info/en/?search=Hazel_Shermet /info/en/?search=Julia_Roberts_(QVC_presenter) /info/en/?search=Joe_Mauer /info/en/?search=Stephen_Shortridge /info/en/?search=Tom_Hatton_(actor) /info/en/?search=Harlan_Hogan /info/en/?search=Joseph_Marco /info/en/?search=Stef_Prescott /info/en/?search=Sheena_Halili /info/en/?search=File:Kareena_Kapoor_Khan.jpg /info/en/?search=Ranveer_Singh /info/en/?search=Kelly_Chen_videography /info/en/?search=Sandara_Park /info/en/?search=Jessica_Mauboy_videography /info/en/?search=Ziana_Zain
I just removed the section because it's a massive bloat to the article for little worthwhile reason - if celebtrity endorsements were somehow worthy of inclusion, we should just stick to the few notable ones instead of listing over a hundred(!) people plus the profession, year and gender(???) for each person. This makes a massive table that's of no encyclopedic use to anyone; again, if the section is somehow deemed warranted and not facilitating advertisement on P&G's behalf, the line of text before the table with a few examples is more than enough. RDXL ( talk) 03:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
this article is a bit tilted (a definition, then an effectivity comparison, seems a bit like criticism... just a bit); but the information is correct, perhaps the article should be divided into sections.-- 164.77.109.210 08:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
The reason Head & Shoulders appears copper orange in the movie Evolution is because it is the intensive treatment formula. Rather than pyrithione zinc, it uses selenium sulfide for the active ingredient. Perhaps these two active ingredients should also be listed as such under the article ? 83.84.35.95 17:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
This page appears to be a clear breach of the usual conventions in that it is simply an advertisement board for Head and Shoulders and a range of other products
Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I believe for a time in the early-mid 1990s, Head and Shoulders sponsored NBC's NFL Live! postgame reports until the NFL Live moniker was dropped after the 1994 NFL season. WAVY 10 Fan ( talk) 20:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
This article claims H&S launched the world's first shampoo with zinc pyrithione. I found no links nor references to validate that, and a google search turned up fruitless. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Revlon's ZP-II pre-dates H&S.-- 99.231.196.195 ( talk) 01:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I've listened twice now and I swear that Head and Shoulders is saying that its "hair endurance" formula contains hydrazine? But look at the toxicity data as described in that article. I didn't think that sounded like a likely component for a hair care formula... Wnt ( talk) 00:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
In the UK now the shampoo is now available in seven different fragrances. So who says that capitalism doesn't produce any useful products? Smokey TheCat 19:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Head & Shoulders shampoo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Head & Shoulders shampoo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 02:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
The result of the move request was: speedy closed and not moved per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) -- Calidum 02:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Head & Shoulders →
Head & shoulders – Since the brand name is always lowercase, I believe that the page should be moved to
Head & shoulders per the article naming guidelines.
Gamebuster19901 (
talk)
14:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the information contained is quite objective: Description, some history, and ingredients. Nothing particularly promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.97.2 ( talk) 12:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
As mentioned above, this article was a brochure for the product, not an encyclopedia article. I merged it to the active ingredient and redirected this article and merged the content into the article on the active ingredient, which is what we generally do with promotional articles on specific brands of medicated products or drugs. User:BD2412 restored the article, and created a brief but very solid, and independently sourced encyclopedia article on the brand. I have no objections to this at all. Jytdog ( talk) 17:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
193.201.132.244 ( talk) 14:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC) [1]
I would like to show a list of all the celebrity endorsements and sponsorships carried out by the brand. I believe this is a part of the brand history and legacy. If it is relevant for sporting goods why not consumer goods? User jytdog deleted a list I painstakingly compiled citing the reason as Trivial - this classification is entirely subjective and lacks a thorough definition. looking at celebrity pages on wikipedia shows many such mentions of the celebrities appearing in commercials. it is often a breakthrough indicator of success for actors and sports people to be chosen as ambassadors.
exampleS: /info/en/?search=Emma_Forbes /info/en/?search=Troy_Polamalu /info/en/?search=Joey_Mead_King /info/en/?search=Roger_Tilling /info/en/?search=Georgina_Chapman /info/en/?search=Christian_Neal_Capes /info/en/?search=Hazel_Shermet /info/en/?search=Julia_Roberts_(QVC_presenter) /info/en/?search=Joe_Mauer /info/en/?search=Stephen_Shortridge /info/en/?search=Tom_Hatton_(actor) /info/en/?search=Harlan_Hogan /info/en/?search=Joseph_Marco /info/en/?search=Stef_Prescott /info/en/?search=Sheena_Halili /info/en/?search=File:Kareena_Kapoor_Khan.jpg /info/en/?search=Ranveer_Singh /info/en/?search=Kelly_Chen_videography /info/en/?search=Sandara_Park /info/en/?search=Jessica_Mauboy_videography /info/en/?search=Ziana_Zain
I just removed the section because it's a massive bloat to the article for little worthwhile reason - if celebtrity endorsements were somehow worthy of inclusion, we should just stick to the few notable ones instead of listing over a hundred(!) people plus the profession, year and gender(???) for each person. This makes a massive table that's of no encyclopedic use to anyone; again, if the section is somehow deemed warranted and not facilitating advertisement on P&G's behalf, the line of text before the table with a few examples is more than enough. RDXL ( talk) 03:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)