From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Following is a part from the article Shishunaga dynasty


both this haryanka dynasty and shishunaga are said to be the founder of magadha empire in 684 BC.. Which one is correct?-- sunil 10:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Edits have been made. Haryanka is the correct founder succeeded by Shishunaga. Salilb ( talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Pradyota dynasty

Where does the Pradyota dynasty fit into this chronology? I have added Pradyota dynasty to a new "See also" section, because I am uncertain where it fits into this Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article about the Pradyota dynasty says: "most of the Puranas (except a manuscript of the Brahmanda Purana, preserved in the University of Dhaka) say that this dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty in Magadha". Does evidence prove that that is wrong, and that instead the Harynaka dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty? Anythingyouwant ( talk) 01:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Bengal

@ Teratix: look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me. 193.60.198.37 ( talk) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – Tera tix 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Religion

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=wPB7XoSiboUC&pg=PA92

As per this Haryanka dynasty were patrons of Buddism, Jainism, Hindiusm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Following is a part from the article Shishunaga dynasty


both this haryanka dynasty and shishunaga are said to be the founder of magadha empire in 684 BC.. Which one is correct?-- sunil 10:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Edits have been made. Haryanka is the correct founder succeeded by Shishunaga. Salilb ( talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Pradyota dynasty

Where does the Pradyota dynasty fit into this chronology? I have added Pradyota dynasty to a new "See also" section, because I am uncertain where it fits into this Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article about the Pradyota dynasty says: "most of the Puranas (except a manuscript of the Brahmanda Purana, preserved in the University of Dhaka) say that this dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty in Magadha". Does evidence prove that that is wrong, and that instead the Harynaka dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty? Anythingyouwant ( talk) 01:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Bengal

@ Teratix: look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me. 193.60.198.37 ( talk) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – Tera tix 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Religion

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=wPB7XoSiboUC&pg=PA92

As per this Haryanka dynasty were patrons of Buddism, Jainism, Hindiusm


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook