![]() | Harry Potter Trading Card Game was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think that listing the cards is somewhat redundant since you can find the same cards listed elsewhere on the www. For example www.pojo.com/harrypotter has a complete list and this site is listed in the "external links section of this article. What do you think?
Does anyone know the dates of when AAH and Chamber sets were released?
I removed the line that stated thet many fans were hoping for another expansion because not many people are interested any more and WOTC seems to have no inclination toward making more cards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.237.102.211 ( talk) 22:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
In the List of Card Sets (in order of release), section, I have found two errors, first being Expansion - Diagon Alley (81 cards), which there where 80 cards in total and secondly in Expansion - Chamber of Secrets (143 cards), where there are 140 cards in total. I have corrected these errors. - Hpfan9374 07:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
A good article has the following attributes:
1. It is well written. In this respect: (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it: (a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout; (b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;[2] and (c) contains no original research.
3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it: (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic;[3] and (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
5. It is stable; that is, it is not the subject of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Vandalism reversion, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing) and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
6. It is illustrated, where possible, by images.[4] In this respect: (a) images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.[5]
The article has serious structural, sourcing, and copy edit issues and will likely take longer than one week to fix, so I must fail the article this time around. Hope to see it back in the GAN process another time. Thank you! -- Eustress ( talk) 22:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I was reading Wikipedia:Embedded list and that article made it seem that lists of the form in the "buying cards" section was ok. I'm going to try here a prose version of the card sets section. Please leave feedback on which you think in best.
Cards in this game were released in sets, the first being what is now called the Base Set, which consists of 116 cards. The next set was the Quidditch Cup expansion which has 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (November 2001). This was followed by the Diagon Alley expansion set which has 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (March 2002). Next was the Adventures at Hogwarts expansion set which contains 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (June 2002). The last set released was the Chamber of Secrets expansion which has 140 cards plus 55 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (October 2002). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathman1550 ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
I was reading in Template:Onesource#Usage and it seems to me that the {{onesource}} is for when citations are inappropriate or misinterpreted. On the other hand I can not find anywhere in WP:Citing sources that shows a section needs to have more than one source. Please correct me here if I'm wrong, or correct the Template:Onesource#Usage section to be more plain in meaning what the tag is used for in this article. Thanks Mathman1550 ( talk) 22:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harry Potter Trading Card Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Harry Potter Trading Card Game was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think that listing the cards is somewhat redundant since you can find the same cards listed elsewhere on the www. For example www.pojo.com/harrypotter has a complete list and this site is listed in the "external links section of this article. What do you think?
Does anyone know the dates of when AAH and Chamber sets were released?
I removed the line that stated thet many fans were hoping for another expansion because not many people are interested any more and WOTC seems to have no inclination toward making more cards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.237.102.211 ( talk) 22:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
In the List of Card Sets (in order of release), section, I have found two errors, first being Expansion - Diagon Alley (81 cards), which there where 80 cards in total and secondly in Expansion - Chamber of Secrets (143 cards), where there are 140 cards in total. I have corrected these errors. - Hpfan9374 07:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
A good article has the following attributes:
1. It is well written. In this respect: (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it: (a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout; (b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;[2] and (c) contains no original research.
3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it: (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic;[3] and (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
5. It is stable; that is, it is not the subject of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Vandalism reversion, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing) and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
6. It is illustrated, where possible, by images.[4] In this respect: (a) images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.[5]
The article has serious structural, sourcing, and copy edit issues and will likely take longer than one week to fix, so I must fail the article this time around. Hope to see it back in the GAN process another time. Thank you! -- Eustress ( talk) 22:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I was reading Wikipedia:Embedded list and that article made it seem that lists of the form in the "buying cards" section was ok. I'm going to try here a prose version of the card sets section. Please leave feedback on which you think in best.
Cards in this game were released in sets, the first being what is now called the Base Set, which consists of 116 cards. The next set was the Quidditch Cup expansion which has 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (November 2001). This was followed by the Diagon Alley expansion set which has 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (March 2002). Next was the Adventures at Hogwarts expansion set which contains 80 cards plus 30 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (June 2002). The last set released was the Chamber of Secrets expansion which has 140 cards plus 55 Foil or Hologram Portrait Premium rares (October 2002). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathman1550 ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
I was reading in Template:Onesource#Usage and it seems to me that the {{onesource}} is for when citations are inappropriate or misinterpreted. On the other hand I can not find anywhere in WP:Citing sources that shows a section needs to have more than one source. Please correct me here if I'm wrong, or correct the Template:Onesource#Usage section to be more plain in meaning what the tag is used for in this article. Thanks Mathman1550 ( talk) 22:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harry Potter Trading Card Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)