From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quota Determination

Under 2. Determining the quota, is this describing a Droop quota, a Hare quota, or some other system? If the last, what is that system called?

1.126.108.98 ( talk) 22:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Animation explaining the distribution of preferences

I'd suggest that a great addition to this page would be an animation similar to this one illustrating the 2016 Murrumbidgee count (by Markus Mannheim, originally embedded in this ABC News article), so that people can imagine how the quotas / vote exhaustion works. Is this something that is possible in Wikipedia? Data geeks? Stuart mcmillen ( talk) 03:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Tasmania and ACT uses Gregory method but uses only last parcel received

description of the Hare-Clark does not mention that only the last parcel is examined to determine transfers. 68.150.205.46 ( talk) 03:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quota Determination

Under 2. Determining the quota, is this describing a Droop quota, a Hare quota, or some other system? If the last, what is that system called?

1.126.108.98 ( talk) 22:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Animation explaining the distribution of preferences

I'd suggest that a great addition to this page would be an animation similar to this one illustrating the 2016 Murrumbidgee count (by Markus Mannheim, originally embedded in this ABC News article), so that people can imagine how the quotas / vote exhaustion works. Is this something that is possible in Wikipedia? Data geeks? Stuart mcmillen ( talk) 03:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Tasmania and ACT uses Gregory method but uses only last parcel received

description of the Hare-Clark does not mention that only the last parcel is examined to determine transfers. 68.150.205.46 ( talk) 03:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook