This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This edit by IP. Per "Origins" section, shouldn't we add both of them to infobox? -- Wario-Man ( talk) 08:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
There are by far too few aDNA-finds backing this bold claim "R-M207 and its subclades were most common along an axis from Western Europe to South Asia." HJJHolm ( talk) 06:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
No modern linguist or glottochronologist claims the existence of any "centum branch" of Indo-European languages. This view is outdated since 50 years.... 2003:7A:9F34:AB78:E81C:AB59:E90B:7BA8 ( talk) 10:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Haplogroup R1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haplogroup R1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Has anybody else watched the video which is referenced under the "popular culture" heading? While it seems to be depicting a Bashkhir legend, there is absolutely nothing which indicates that there was an intentional attempt to depict a kind of actual history of divergence between R1, R1a, and R1b. The YouTube channel associated with the video does not seem to belong to Artem Lukichev, whoever that may be, and the only other references to the idea that the film is supposed to be about R1 are reposts of the same video. It seems more likely that the channel owner uploaded the film with his own notes in the subtitles, pushing a personal theory that the legend could in some way be reflective of genetic history. There is no evidence that any alleged similarities were an intentional creative choice on the part of the filmmaker. The addition of the film to the Wiki article first appears on August 5, 2014 which is the same date the video was posted. My suspicion is also that the editor of the article, Bulat Muratov, may be the owner of the YouTube channel hosting the video as well. 75.97.28.5 ( talk) 04:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This edit by IP. Per "Origins" section, shouldn't we add both of them to infobox? -- Wario-Man ( talk) 08:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
There are by far too few aDNA-finds backing this bold claim "R-M207 and its subclades were most common along an axis from Western Europe to South Asia." HJJHolm ( talk) 06:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
No modern linguist or glottochronologist claims the existence of any "centum branch" of Indo-European languages. This view is outdated since 50 years.... 2003:7A:9F34:AB78:E81C:AB59:E90B:7BA8 ( talk) 10:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Haplogroup R1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haplogroup R1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Has anybody else watched the video which is referenced under the "popular culture" heading? While it seems to be depicting a Bashkhir legend, there is absolutely nothing which indicates that there was an intentional attempt to depict a kind of actual history of divergence between R1, R1a, and R1b. The YouTube channel associated with the video does not seem to belong to Artem Lukichev, whoever that may be, and the only other references to the idea that the film is supposed to be about R1 are reposts of the same video. It seems more likely that the channel owner uploaded the film with his own notes in the subtitles, pushing a personal theory that the legend could in some way be reflective of genetic history. There is no evidence that any alleged similarities were an intentional creative choice on the part of the filmmaker. The addition of the film to the Wiki article first appears on August 5, 2014 which is the same date the video was posted. My suspicion is also that the editor of the article, Bulat Muratov, may be the owner of the YouTube channel hosting the video as well. 75.97.28.5 ( talk) 04:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)