This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
Name
How does one distinguish between this deity Hapi and the Son of Horus Hapi?
The hieroglyphic spelling is distinctive. However, I have a problem in the way they are usually distinguished in transliteration: I would expect the spelling to be the other way around. I don't have my handbook with me at the moment, but the name of
Hapison of Horus is
You might want to check out
transliteration of ancient Egyptian, for tips on how these are transliterated. The problem is the final vowel of each is represented by different signs that are usually given the same sound: the double reed of Hapi and the parallel slashes of Hapy are both usually transliterated with y. —
Gareth Hughes16:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Perhaps the creator of the image,
User:Jeff Dahl, could shed some light on this, but I think we have either an anachronism or mis-translation in the caption. Ancient Egyptians had no concept of "genies", or "djinn" proper, and the analogous concept of nature spirits in Egyptian mythology wouldn't apply here. Ancient Egyptians did have a concept of tutelary and locus
genius (mythology), even before the Ptolemaic or Roman periods, and I'm assuming that's what was probably meant here. Though it's common sense, in case there is any chance of accidental original research, or dispute, I'm just noting it here on the talk page. I'll change "genies" to the bluelinked "genii" (piped to article "genius (mythology)", even though it's the Latinised form of the word and links to the Roman form of the shared (but varied) concept of the ancient world, as I don't believe we have any articles which discuss the concept in a specifically Egyptian cultural context. If there are any suggestions as to a better alternative, feel free to suggest it, or just be
WP:BOLD.
Quinto Simmaco (
talk)
19:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
Name
How does one distinguish between this deity Hapi and the Son of Horus Hapi?
The hieroglyphic spelling is distinctive. However, I have a problem in the way they are usually distinguished in transliteration: I would expect the spelling to be the other way around. I don't have my handbook with me at the moment, but the name of
Hapison of Horus is
You might want to check out
transliteration of ancient Egyptian, for tips on how these are transliterated. The problem is the final vowel of each is represented by different signs that are usually given the same sound: the double reed of Hapi and the parallel slashes of Hapy are both usually transliterated with y. —
Gareth Hughes16:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Perhaps the creator of the image,
User:Jeff Dahl, could shed some light on this, but I think we have either an anachronism or mis-translation in the caption. Ancient Egyptians had no concept of "genies", or "djinn" proper, and the analogous concept of nature spirits in Egyptian mythology wouldn't apply here. Ancient Egyptians did have a concept of tutelary and locus
genius (mythology), even before the Ptolemaic or Roman periods, and I'm assuming that's what was probably meant here. Though it's common sense, in case there is any chance of accidental original research, or dispute, I'm just noting it here on the talk page. I'll change "genies" to the bluelinked "genii" (piped to article "genius (mythology)", even though it's the Latinised form of the word and links to the Roman form of the shared (but varied) concept of the ancient world, as I don't believe we have any articles which discuss the concept in a specifically Egyptian cultural context. If there are any suggestions as to a better alternative, feel free to suggest it, or just be
WP:BOLD.
Quinto Simmaco (
talk)
19:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)reply