This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure the term 'Hansonism' really exists as a concept enough to merit a separate article. It's not uncommon to stick 'ism' after a prominent politician's name. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 11:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Check the talk page for Trumpism, with the latest subject being how Pauline Hanson is a Trumpist with a lot of sources, and many, many comparisons to Donald Trump. This article should just be renamed "Trumpism in Australia". 2001:8003:AD13:F800:8422:E091:4411:722D ( talk) 09:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "widely"? AnonMoos ( talk) 23:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"She is widely considered to be the Australian equivalent of Donald Trump." is extremely problematic. She was not close to becoming the leader in Australia, nor does a Prime-Minister and President do the same role. Perhaps a comparison to MTG is more suitable to properly scale her importance in the Australian government, while being as close to a comparison of a politician from a different country.
I also don't know how you can quantify the word "widely believed" either through an opinion piece. The highest number reported was 13% One Nation preference for Hanson's home state in the listed source - that's not close to widely by any traditional definition. Perhaps a "Her shared political beliefs are noted by some as an Australian oriented version comparable to MTG/Trump". Titaniumman23 ( talk) 05:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure the term 'Hansonism' really exists as a concept enough to merit a separate article. It's not uncommon to stick 'ism' after a prominent politician's name. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 11:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Check the talk page for Trumpism, with the latest subject being how Pauline Hanson is a Trumpist with a lot of sources, and many, many comparisons to Donald Trump. This article should just be renamed "Trumpism in Australia". 2001:8003:AD13:F800:8422:E091:4411:722D ( talk) 09:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "widely"? AnonMoos ( talk) 23:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
"She is widely considered to be the Australian equivalent of Donald Trump." is extremely problematic. She was not close to becoming the leader in Australia, nor does a Prime-Minister and President do the same role. Perhaps a comparison to MTG is more suitable to properly scale her importance in the Australian government, while being as close to a comparison of a politician from a different country.
I also don't know how you can quantify the word "widely believed" either through an opinion piece. The highest number reported was 13% One Nation preference for Hanson's home state in the listed source - that's not close to widely by any traditional definition. Perhaps a "Her shared political beliefs are noted by some as an Australian oriented version comparable to MTG/Trump". Titaniumman23 ( talk) 05:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)