This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hannah Montana 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This album has a release date, cover art and track listing. Notable artist and franchise. Marginal for WP:NALBUMS and tagged as such. IMO sufficient for stub of album article that will definitely have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject when released. Redirect is reasonable, of course, but I don't believe it should be done in this case. I think this article should stay and be allowed to grow. -- NrDg 17:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I restore the Amazon.com reference as it is the only reliable source we have right now for the album details as we know them. The other reference that was used for these details was a known unreliable blog posting that, until recently, had incorrect information about this album posted. It likely got the updated info from us and/or Amazon.com. There is strong indications that this site does not do fact checking. Amazon.com is not being used as an external link, it is solely being used as a reliable source of album information. I do not see this use violating
WP:SPAM - it is only being used as a convenience reference link to support factual details. --
NrDg
04:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
To add, the Amazon.com link supports album existence, name, release date and track listing. It is the only authoritative source available right now until we get a Disney press release. If we can get another
WP:RS to replace that, it would be great, but so far that does not exist - the blog posting is not a
WP:RS and must be removed. The intention of adding the reference is not to SPAM. We are not prohibited from linking to commercial sites if we have a valid encyclopedic reason unrelated to sales inducement. --
NrDg
05:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
The bakground section on Hannah Montana 3 was useful and indicated the musical and fashion inspirations for the artists new look. I think that it was a good addition to the album's information. Most album articles in Wikipedia posses a "background" section including Breakout and B'Day by Beyoncé Knowles. The subdivision had references and a video was published under a DVD released by Disney. It should have remained in the article and now must be reverted.
O.K. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipodnano05 ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't think that citations are needed for stating that "He Could Be the One" premiered on Radio Disney June 12 or for "Ice Cream Freeze" reaching the to the top of the Dot Com Top 3. At first, those statements did need a citation and they did have. Radio Disney was the old source, but since Radio Disney doesn't keep records or saves old planet premieres they are not needing a citation. They did have a reliable source at once and now you know that those statements are cocrrect, so they don't need a cite. Personally, I ran a google search on those two things at least 15 times each and no reliable sources appeared (only fansites and blogs). So I dispute that those cn's are unecessary. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 23:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
The singles from this album have been deleted and they should not have been. It is true that the singles are not of whom have charted on charts and that Radio Disney charts are not proper to be used. BUT these are notable songs that have had significant airplay and NEED to have mentioning in the article. It's not like the information says Radio Disney is an official chart or anything along those lines. And it's not like even an article especifically for those songs have been created. This just simply states info on commercial and fanatical reception. Not anything too promising has been said or stated either. And EVEN adminitstrators have contributed to the growth of the section. A song charting does not make it a single, it only measures the success of the single. What makes it a single is its release as a download/physical CD and release to airplay, two things that are factored into the positions of even the most notable and quintessential charts like Billboard's Hot 100. It is foolish to delete information that is valuable and adds to the article. In summation, the information HAS to remain in the article. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 01:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
-
How come It's All Right Here was taken off the Hannah Montana 3 Soundtrack Singles list? The Music Video was shown on Disney CHannel in November 2008 it was for the promotion for Season 3 of Hannah Montana, can someone add it back on? - Alec2011 ( talk) 14:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that Release history - Catalog is useless. It is not important. Can I remove the catalog?? Dennissell ( talk) 06:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
It may seems a little pointless and uninportant, but in the standard for a release history it must be included, see Wikipedia:Albums#Release history. So no, the catalog section should not be removed. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 07:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
The "Singles" section in the article is incorrect. None of those songs are singles, yes they did recieve airplay and entered charts, but so did Miley Cyrus's " Breakout". That doesn't mean it is an official single. I think the section could easily be changed to "Songs" due to that, not even "Let's Do This" or "Let's Get Crazy" are singles. They were not released to digital retailers as "singles" or "Radio Disney Exclusive: (Name of the song) - Single" to iTunes. They should, however, be mentioned because they charted and recieved airplay. Let's face it they ARE NOT singles. Another point which I want to bring about the single section is the format, lists and asterisks (bullets) should be avoided, the information should be a paragraph form. Maybe a paragraph for each. But still, tnat would disturb the flow of the article due to that some of the information for songs like "It's All Right Here", "Don't Wanna Be Torn" and "Supergirl" is not more than two sentences (by the way the intro to each song... Ex: "Supergirl" is a song from Hannah Montana 3 is obvious and repetative data). So, I would like discuss before making any edits that could lead to potential edit wars. Please share your opinion. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 14:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There's no picture posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.198.136 ( talk) 12:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hannah Montana 3's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "riaa":
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum&lista=top40&ev=2009&het=41&submit_=Keres%C3%A9sl{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/45441{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/46967{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/46967When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hannah Montana 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This album has a release date, cover art and track listing. Notable artist and franchise. Marginal for WP:NALBUMS and tagged as such. IMO sufficient for stub of album article that will definitely have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject when released. Redirect is reasonable, of course, but I don't believe it should be done in this case. I think this article should stay and be allowed to grow. -- NrDg 17:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I restore the Amazon.com reference as it is the only reliable source we have right now for the album details as we know them. The other reference that was used for these details was a known unreliable blog posting that, until recently, had incorrect information about this album posted. It likely got the updated info from us and/or Amazon.com. There is strong indications that this site does not do fact checking. Amazon.com is not being used as an external link, it is solely being used as a reliable source of album information. I do not see this use violating
WP:SPAM - it is only being used as a convenience reference link to support factual details. --
NrDg
04:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
To add, the Amazon.com link supports album existence, name, release date and track listing. It is the only authoritative source available right now until we get a Disney press release. If we can get another
WP:RS to replace that, it would be great, but so far that does not exist - the blog posting is not a
WP:RS and must be removed. The intention of adding the reference is not to SPAM. We are not prohibited from linking to commercial sites if we have a valid encyclopedic reason unrelated to sales inducement. --
NrDg
05:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
The bakground section on Hannah Montana 3 was useful and indicated the musical and fashion inspirations for the artists new look. I think that it was a good addition to the album's information. Most album articles in Wikipedia posses a "background" section including Breakout and B'Day by Beyoncé Knowles. The subdivision had references and a video was published under a DVD released by Disney. It should have remained in the article and now must be reverted.
O.K. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipodnano05 ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't think that citations are needed for stating that "He Could Be the One" premiered on Radio Disney June 12 or for "Ice Cream Freeze" reaching the to the top of the Dot Com Top 3. At first, those statements did need a citation and they did have. Radio Disney was the old source, but since Radio Disney doesn't keep records or saves old planet premieres they are not needing a citation. They did have a reliable source at once and now you know that those statements are cocrrect, so they don't need a cite. Personally, I ran a google search on those two things at least 15 times each and no reliable sources appeared (only fansites and blogs). So I dispute that those cn's are unecessary. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 23:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
The singles from this album have been deleted and they should not have been. It is true that the singles are not of whom have charted on charts and that Radio Disney charts are not proper to be used. BUT these are notable songs that have had significant airplay and NEED to have mentioning in the article. It's not like the information says Radio Disney is an official chart or anything along those lines. And it's not like even an article especifically for those songs have been created. This just simply states info on commercial and fanatical reception. Not anything too promising has been said or stated either. And EVEN adminitstrators have contributed to the growth of the section. A song charting does not make it a single, it only measures the success of the single. What makes it a single is its release as a download/physical CD and release to airplay, two things that are factored into the positions of even the most notable and quintessential charts like Billboard's Hot 100. It is foolish to delete information that is valuable and adds to the article. In summation, the information HAS to remain in the article. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 01:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
-
How come It's All Right Here was taken off the Hannah Montana 3 Soundtrack Singles list? The Music Video was shown on Disney CHannel in November 2008 it was for the promotion for Season 3 of Hannah Montana, can someone add it back on? - Alec2011 ( talk) 14:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that Release history - Catalog is useless. It is not important. Can I remove the catalog?? Dennissell ( talk) 06:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
It may seems a little pointless and uninportant, but in the standard for a release history it must be included, see Wikipedia:Albums#Release history. So no, the catalog section should not be removed. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 07:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
The "Singles" section in the article is incorrect. None of those songs are singles, yes they did recieve airplay and entered charts, but so did Miley Cyrus's " Breakout". That doesn't mean it is an official single. I think the section could easily be changed to "Songs" due to that, not even "Let's Do This" or "Let's Get Crazy" are singles. They were not released to digital retailers as "singles" or "Radio Disney Exclusive: (Name of the song) - Single" to iTunes. They should, however, be mentioned because they charted and recieved airplay. Let's face it they ARE NOT singles. Another point which I want to bring about the single section is the format, lists and asterisks (bullets) should be avoided, the information should be a paragraph form. Maybe a paragraph for each. But still, tnat would disturb the flow of the article due to that some of the information for songs like "It's All Right Here", "Don't Wanna Be Torn" and "Supergirl" is not more than two sentences (by the way the intro to each song... Ex: "Supergirl" is a song from Hannah Montana 3 is obvious and repetative data). So, I would like discuss before making any edits that could lead to potential edit wars. Please share your opinion. -- Ipodnano05 ( talk) 14:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There's no picture posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.198.136 ( talk) 12:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hannah Montana 3's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "riaa":
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hannah Montana 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum&lista=top40&ev=2009&het=41&submit_=Keres%C3%A9sl{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/45441{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/46967{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://acharts.us/album/46967When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)