GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sagecandor ( talk · contribs) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I'll do this one.
Sagecandor (
talk)
20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 19, 2016, compares against the six good article criteria:
This article is good. It's not great, but it's good. Strongly suggest further copy editing. But it's good enough for good article. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor ( talk) 23:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sagecandor ( talk · contribs) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I'll do this one.
Sagecandor (
talk)
20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 19, 2016, compares against the six good article criteria:
This article is good. It's not great, but it's good. Strongly suggest further copy editing. But it's good enough for good article. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor ( talk) 23:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)