The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Review
Well-written:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (prose)
In Reception, might wanna expand British MP John Sandeman Allen raised the issue... to British member of parliament John Sandeman Allen raised the issue....
In Centennial commemorative, I had to Google what "protracted" meant. Maybe I'm dumb, but I'd change it to "drawn out" or something of the sort.
In Reception, The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. should be The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal was to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. or something of the sort.
Spotchecking Stocker 2005, Stocker 2010, and Stocker 2011.
Stocker 2005: LGTM
Stocker 2010: LGTM (I didn't realize this was only invoked once...)
Stocker 2011: footnote 23, article states In late August and September 1938, a competition was held for the design of the commemorative half-crown, as well as for the proposed penny and halfpenny denominations, however the source seems to specify Competitors were allowed to submit any number of designs in the brief timeframe available between the date of invitation, 22 August 1938, and the closing date of 30 September. Otherwise, LGTM.
On hold
(c) (original research)
LGTM
Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
One minor spot of CLOP:
In Centennial commemorative, This change was approved by the High Commissioner in August 1939, and the coin entered production. Any way to reword "approved by the High Commissioner"?
On hold
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
LGTM
Pass
(b) (focused)
LGTM
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
LGTM
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
This is fine.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Review
Well-written:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (prose)
In Reception, might wanna expand British MP John Sandeman Allen raised the issue... to British member of parliament John Sandeman Allen raised the issue....
In Centennial commemorative, I had to Google what "protracted" meant. Maybe I'm dumb, but I'd change it to "drawn out" or something of the sort.
In Reception, The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. should be The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal was to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. or something of the sort.
Spotchecking Stocker 2005, Stocker 2010, and Stocker 2011.
Stocker 2005: LGTM
Stocker 2010: LGTM (I didn't realize this was only invoked once...)
Stocker 2011: footnote 23, article states In late August and September 1938, a competition was held for the design of the commemorative half-crown, as well as for the proposed penny and halfpenny denominations, however the source seems to specify Competitors were allowed to submit any number of designs in the brief timeframe available between the date of invitation, 22 August 1938, and the closing date of 30 September. Otherwise, LGTM.
On hold
(c) (original research)
LGTM
Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
One minor spot of CLOP:
In Centennial commemorative, This change was approved by the High Commissioner in August 1939, and the coin entered production. Any way to reword "approved by the High Commissioner"?
On hold
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
LGTM
Pass
(b) (focused)
LGTM
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
LGTM
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
This is fine.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.