Hal Johnson and Joanne McLeod has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 1, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Body_Break&oldid=323835626
Cincinnati Reds reference is new to me. -- Zanimum ( talk) 03:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
https://andreacoutu.com/bodybreak-couples-secret-revealed/
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Canadianhockeyfan79 ( talk · contribs) 22:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I've decided to take on this GA review, especially since you've been waiting for so long. I should have it done in about 7 days or so! Canadianhockeyfan79 ( talk) 22:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
None of the "immediate failure" conditions apply in this case!
The article is well put together and contains few mistakes. The prose is very clear and the article complies with a manual of style. There are a couple of minor errors however:
Ultimately, this article is very well written and has very few errors. It clearly meets the GA criteria, without the suggested edits.
Hold
Pass!
Pass
Pass
Hold.
Ultimately, I feel that this article is one photograph away from a pass. I'll place this on hold for now but I'll pass when you add one! If you can't find a photo let me know!
Zanimum,
Canadianhockeyfan79, where does this nomination stand? It's been about a month and a half since the article was last edited, and there haven't been any posts here or to the article's talk page either. I should probably point out that the
GA criteria state about media (including images) that The presence of media is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if media with acceptable copyright status is appropriate and readily available, then such media should be provided.
If there aren't any usable photographs available, then per the criteria that shouldn't be a bar to passage.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
01:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Hal Johnson and Joanne McLeod has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 1, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Body_Break&oldid=323835626
Cincinnati Reds reference is new to me. -- Zanimum ( talk) 03:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
https://andreacoutu.com/bodybreak-couples-secret-revealed/
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Canadianhockeyfan79 ( talk · contribs) 22:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I've decided to take on this GA review, especially since you've been waiting for so long. I should have it done in about 7 days or so! Canadianhockeyfan79 ( talk) 22:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
None of the "immediate failure" conditions apply in this case!
The article is well put together and contains few mistakes. The prose is very clear and the article complies with a manual of style. There are a couple of minor errors however:
Ultimately, this article is very well written and has very few errors. It clearly meets the GA criteria, without the suggested edits.
Hold
Pass!
Pass
Pass
Hold.
Ultimately, I feel that this article is one photograph away from a pass. I'll place this on hold for now but I'll pass when you add one! If you can't find a photo let me know!
Zanimum,
Canadianhockeyfan79, where does this nomination stand? It's been about a month and a half since the article was last edited, and there haven't been any posts here or to the article's talk page either. I should probably point out that the
GA criteria state about media (including images) that The presence of media is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if media with acceptable copyright status is appropriate and readily available, then such media should be provided.
If there aren't any usable photographs available, then per the criteria that shouldn't be a bar to passage.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
01:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)