This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spiders Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Algeria / Cameroon / Equatorial Guinea / Ivory Coast / Kenya / Malawi / Republic of the Congo / South Africa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Algeria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Cameroon (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Ivory Coast (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Malawi (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Republic of the Congo (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as Low-importance). China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. South America: Argentina / Brazil / Chile / Venezuela Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Brazil (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Chile (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Low-importance). Puerto Rico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@ Peter coxhead: It seems like for me, and @ Samtar: it considers this not a stub? Using AWB it removed the stub tag. Dat Guy ^Talk _Contribs 18:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

@ DatGuy: I think AWB will classify an article as not a stub solely from number of links and length of article. The mistag here is entirely on us though, should have reviewed the edit -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 18:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

@ DatGuy and Samtar: AWB can only make decisions based on necessarily simplistic algorithms, so I don't regard it as a bug. All it's suggested edits need to be reviewed by the editors who use it. Peter coxhead ( talk) 07:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Peter coxhead: I agree, however I believe that as long as there is a 'stub' quality level on the talk page, it shouldn't be changed on the article. Dat Guy ^Talk _Contribs 10:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Definitely the two need to be kept in sync. Peter coxhead ( talk) 10:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply