This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

A rough list of things that might be included in a "see also" list or integrated into the article proper:

• Flintknapper
• Cascade point

PaladinWhite 05:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Added:

• Knapping (redirect from Flintknapper)
• Projectile point (mentions numerous point types, including Cascade points)

__ Just plain Bill ( talk) 22:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

"The evolution of hand tools would be greatly altered had the people of our past failed to invent the idea of hafting." What would be the reference for this type of statement? What could possibly be the basis for this type of projection other than speculation? SquashEngineer ( talk) 13:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply