![]() | Hadspen, Tasmania has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 24, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Hadspen, Tasmania appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 June 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
...fixed this mostly. In fact I reordered and rewrote some of the lead. I changed 20th to "late 20th" as there is no reliable source I've found as to when this was done. The most certain dates are after 1953 and before 1978. Will look at this again soon - Peripitus (Talk) 12:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
... fixed. I'd welcome you checking the wording I've used - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
... your version is better. Changed now - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
...the source—this has worried me as it used more for two churches merging—says consummated. A second source say that construction was finished on that day so I've changed this to completed. Consecration may have happened in the early 1970s but the Anglican Church source I have is unclear. Possibly this is because of the transition from the Church of England to the Anglican Church around that time. Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
...This is in the geography section. I've added, from one source, that it is in a rural setting. The following sentence broadly covers its surrounds - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Anyway, will keep an eye as you go, don't hesitate to ask for clarification...cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
Hence.....(drumroll) Pass or Fail:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hadspen, Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Hadspen, Tasmania has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 24, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Hadspen, Tasmania appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 June 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
...fixed this mostly. In fact I reordered and rewrote some of the lead. I changed 20th to "late 20th" as there is no reliable source I've found as to when this was done. The most certain dates are after 1953 and before 1978. Will look at this again soon - Peripitus (Talk) 12:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
... fixed. I'd welcome you checking the wording I've used - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
... your version is better. Changed now - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
...the source—this has worried me as it used more for two churches merging—says consummated. A second source say that construction was finished on that day so I've changed this to completed. Consecration may have happened in the early 1970s but the Anglican Church source I have is unclear. Possibly this is because of the transition from the Church of England to the Anglican Church around that time. Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
...This is in the geography section. I've added, from one source, that it is in a rural setting. The following sentence broadly covers its surrounds - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Anyway, will keep an eye as you go, don't hesitate to ask for clarification...cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
Hence.....(drumroll) Pass or Fail:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hadspen, Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)