![]() | Haakon IV has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on December 16, 2021, and December 16, 2022. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
I have made some extensive changes to this page, mostly in the form of an expansion of the existing text, but also some clarification and correction of mistakes. As I am a relatively new user of wikipedia, I forgot to write an edit summary of my changes, therefore I am writing this. If anyone reads this, I would appreciate your thoughts on whether it would be useful to put some sub-headers into the new article. Barend 12:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
I have only seen the saga referred to as 'hakonar saga hakonarsonar', and that is also the name of the copy of the original language version in my university library. The 'google-test' gives 20 500 Hakonar saga hakonarsonar, and 36 hakonar saga gamla. ( Barend 16:57, 8 February 2006 (UTC))
Is the Sturlung-öld template really appropriate here? It's big, makes the article look messy, and only very peripherally connected to the topic of the article. I suggest deleting it.-- Barend 12:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Tarnation! How does an English speaker pronounce this friggin' guy's name??
It is good to see some good work done on this article again. I have an issue with the initial phrasing of Haakon's relationship with Skule, though. Saying he "shared the royal administration" with Skule until 1240, implies they were co-rulers, which they weren't. Skule was regent during Haakon's minority, but by 1240, Skule was a Duke and Haakon was king.-- Barend ( talk) 06:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
From a quick read of this article and the references, this article appears to be at or about GA level, possibly well on its way to being a WP:FAC. Nevertheless I'm just going to review it against WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
...Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 10:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting an informative article
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Its a good article and now A Good Article. Congratulations. Pyrotec ( talk) 10:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haakon IV of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Haakon IV has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on December 16, 2021, and December 16, 2022. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
I have made some extensive changes to this page, mostly in the form of an expansion of the existing text, but also some clarification and correction of mistakes. As I am a relatively new user of wikipedia, I forgot to write an edit summary of my changes, therefore I am writing this. If anyone reads this, I would appreciate your thoughts on whether it would be useful to put some sub-headers into the new article. Barend 12:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
I have only seen the saga referred to as 'hakonar saga hakonarsonar', and that is also the name of the copy of the original language version in my university library. The 'google-test' gives 20 500 Hakonar saga hakonarsonar, and 36 hakonar saga gamla. ( Barend 16:57, 8 February 2006 (UTC))
Is the Sturlung-öld template really appropriate here? It's big, makes the article look messy, and only very peripherally connected to the topic of the article. I suggest deleting it.-- Barend 12:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Tarnation! How does an English speaker pronounce this friggin' guy's name??
It is good to see some good work done on this article again. I have an issue with the initial phrasing of Haakon's relationship with Skule, though. Saying he "shared the royal administration" with Skule until 1240, implies they were co-rulers, which they weren't. Skule was regent during Haakon's minority, but by 1240, Skule was a Duke and Haakon was king.-- Barend ( talk) 06:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
From a quick read of this article and the references, this article appears to be at or about GA level, possibly well on its way to being a WP:FAC. Nevertheless I'm just going to review it against WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
...Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 10:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting an informative article
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Its a good article and now A Good Article. Congratulations. Pyrotec ( talk) 10:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haakon IV of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)