![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original section on the subject repeated the facts three times, and dealt much with the trial and conviction, rather than the execution itself. I trimmed it down and add a pointer to the original article for interested readers. The sources itself were also a large mix, not appropriate for footnotes, including a list of 21 (!) consecutive footnote, images as source, wikipedia itself as sources etc. If some of this is to be repeated it needs to be done properly. -- Muhandes ( talk) 15:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
User Bepopalula has been running a biased campaign on these pages trying to include unnecessary information about the execution of Ronald Ryan. The information has been added to the following articles...
In all cases, the information is a rambling attempt to show that Ronald Ryan was wrongly convicted and executed. It is poorly written, badly cited, largely subjective, and does not belong in any of the articles it has been repeatedly put in to.
Bepopalula has repeatedly replaced the info, and his edit summary claim that my (and others') attempts to remove this are labelled as vandalism.
While preparing this response, I noticed that the concerns had already been raised previously with regard to user 93.185.104.30, who made identical changes to the exact same four pages.
Can administrators take note of my concerns and take appropriate action as needed.
Thanks.--
Dmol (
talk)
04:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:HM Prison Pentridge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The end of the first section, about the development of the property, is nothing more than an uncited, one-sided statement of opinion. -- 189.216.179.46 ( talk) 06:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 06:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 16:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on HM Prison Pentridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original section on the subject repeated the facts three times, and dealt much with the trial and conviction, rather than the execution itself. I trimmed it down and add a pointer to the original article for interested readers. The sources itself were also a large mix, not appropriate for footnotes, including a list of 21 (!) consecutive footnote, images as source, wikipedia itself as sources etc. If some of this is to be repeated it needs to be done properly. -- Muhandes ( talk) 15:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
User Bepopalula has been running a biased campaign on these pages trying to include unnecessary information about the execution of Ronald Ryan. The information has been added to the following articles...
In all cases, the information is a rambling attempt to show that Ronald Ryan was wrongly convicted and executed. It is poorly written, badly cited, largely subjective, and does not belong in any of the articles it has been repeatedly put in to.
Bepopalula has repeatedly replaced the info, and his edit summary claim that my (and others') attempts to remove this are labelled as vandalism.
While preparing this response, I noticed that the concerns had already been raised previously with regard to user 93.185.104.30, who made identical changes to the exact same four pages.
Can administrators take note of my concerns and take appropriate action as needed.
Thanks.--
Dmol (
talk)
04:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:HM Prison Pentridge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The end of the first section, about the development of the property, is nothing more than an uncited, one-sided statement of opinion. -- 189.216.179.46 ( talk) 06:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 06:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 16:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on HM Prison Pentridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)