This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Ontario (1780) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-06-14. The result of the discussion was speedy redirected. |
![]() | A fact from HMS Ontario (1780) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 8,600 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
We have both HMS Ontario (1780) and HMS Ontario. Both pages deal with the same subject. I propose we merge this page into HMS Ontario. I don't think we need the disambiguation on the 1780 - how many HMS Ontarios are there? What are your thoughts? Fraud talk to me 01:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Anybody wants to volunteer to contact the divers to see if they can donate some of their photos to wiki? I don't think there is any other way to get those beautiful shipwreck shots in here. Xenonice ( talk) 02:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Throughout this article the Ship is referred to as "it" rather the correct pronoun "she". Even an amateur ship enthusiast would know this, and an expert most certainly would. This article was written by someone has has no studied knowledge of the subject, and cannot be trusted as being in any way accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.215.186 ( talk) 13:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Surely this would not have been called a "ship" in 1780? Andrew Yong ( talk) 16:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Ontario (1780). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Ontario (1780) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-06-14. The result of the discussion was speedy redirected. |
![]() | A fact from HMS Ontario (1780) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 8,600 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
We have both HMS Ontario (1780) and HMS Ontario. Both pages deal with the same subject. I propose we merge this page into HMS Ontario. I don't think we need the disambiguation on the 1780 - how many HMS Ontarios are there? What are your thoughts? Fraud talk to me 01:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Anybody wants to volunteer to contact the divers to see if they can donate some of their photos to wiki? I don't think there is any other way to get those beautiful shipwreck shots in here. Xenonice ( talk) 02:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Throughout this article the Ship is referred to as "it" rather the correct pronoun "she". Even an amateur ship enthusiast would know this, and an expert most certainly would. This article was written by someone has has no studied knowledge of the subject, and cannot be trusted as being in any way accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.215.186 ( talk) 13:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Surely this would not have been called a "ship" in 1780? Andrew Yong ( talk) 16:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Ontario (1780). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)