From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Jack4576 (
talk ·
contribs )
13:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar) :
The prose, spelling, and grammar are all up to a high standard.
b. (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
The lead section provides a good summary of the topic, the layout is clear and organized, the word choice is appropriate and not fiction-based, and no lists are present that would disrupt the flow of the article.
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a. (
reference section ) :
The article is well-referenced throughout.
b. (citations to
reliable sources ) :
The citations link to reliable sources, such as well-respected books and official records.
c. (
OR ) :
There doesn't seem to be any original research; all information is supported by citations.
d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism ) :
There is no evidence of copyright violation or plagiarism.
It is broad in its coverage .
a. (
major aspects ) :
The article covers all major aspects of the subject, including its construction, deployments, and eventual decommission.
b. (
focused ) :
The article remains focused on the subject throughout.
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
The article appears to be written from a neutral point of view, without favoring any particular perspective.
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
There is no evidence of any edit wars or major disputes over the content.
It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales ) :
Images are used appropriately
b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
as above
Overall :
Pass/fail :
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)