![]() | HMS Hampshire (1903) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 24, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.
Hello. Apologies if this does not fit with the usual format and method of referencing - still new to this system. I'd like to draw your attention to recent research by myself and others which has revealed that the previously accepted figure of 655 crewmen as HMS Hampshire's complement is well short of the actual number on board on 5 June 1916. The figure of 655 was published by many newspapers at the time and is most likley derived from the figure given in contemporaneous editions of Jane's Fighting Ships. A total of 737 lives were lost, 12 survivors. Kitchener and party totalled 14 men, and the number of crew lost was 723 out of 735. This is based on detail gathered by myself and others from various sources including the Commonwealth War Graves Commission via cwgc.org, and by examination of primary sources held at The National Archives, Kew (e.g. ADM 116/1526 HMS Hampshire Sunk 5th June 1916 - Casualties). Our list of crewmembers matches (in number at least, although we have corrected a few spellings) the list of casualties and survivors compiled by Don Kindell and available at www.naval-history.net/xDKCas1916-06Jun.htm Don Kindell's list of Kitchener's party is not far off - he has the right number of individuals as 14, albeit not all named and one mis-named. I discovered that what must have been a misreading of initial reports that Henry SURGUY-SHIELDS should be two separate individuals, namely Henry SURGUY (Kitchener's valet) and William SHIELDS (Fitzgerald's valet), the latter corresponding to the unnamed 'personal servant' in Kindell's list. The other two unnamed individuals were D.C.BROWN and F.P.WEST (also valets and therefore not clerks as Kindell states).
To better remember the loss of those aboard HMS Hampshire, we (Orkney Heritage Society) raised funds and erected a new wall next to the Kitchener Memorial, engraved with the names of all 737 men lost. For more detail on the project, see www.hmshampshire.org
Thanks and kind regards Fine Hid ( talk) 21:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | HMS Hampshire (1903) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 24, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.
Hello. Apologies if this does not fit with the usual format and method of referencing - still new to this system. I'd like to draw your attention to recent research by myself and others which has revealed that the previously accepted figure of 655 crewmen as HMS Hampshire's complement is well short of the actual number on board on 5 June 1916. The figure of 655 was published by many newspapers at the time and is most likley derived from the figure given in contemporaneous editions of Jane's Fighting Ships. A total of 737 lives were lost, 12 survivors. Kitchener and party totalled 14 men, and the number of crew lost was 723 out of 735. This is based on detail gathered by myself and others from various sources including the Commonwealth War Graves Commission via cwgc.org, and by examination of primary sources held at The National Archives, Kew (e.g. ADM 116/1526 HMS Hampshire Sunk 5th June 1916 - Casualties). Our list of crewmembers matches (in number at least, although we have corrected a few spellings) the list of casualties and survivors compiled by Don Kindell and available at www.naval-history.net/xDKCas1916-06Jun.htm Don Kindell's list of Kitchener's party is not far off - he has the right number of individuals as 14, albeit not all named and one mis-named. I discovered that what must have been a misreading of initial reports that Henry SURGUY-SHIELDS should be two separate individuals, namely Henry SURGUY (Kitchener's valet) and William SHIELDS (Fitzgerald's valet), the latter corresponding to the unnamed 'personal servant' in Kindell's list. The other two unnamed individuals were D.C.BROWN and F.P.WEST (also valets and therefore not clerks as Kindell states).
To better remember the loss of those aboard HMS Hampshire, we (Orkney Heritage Society) raised funds and erected a new wall next to the Kitchener Memorial, engraved with the names of all 737 men lost. For more detail on the project, see www.hmshampshire.org
Thanks and kind regards Fine Hid ( talk) 21:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)