HMS Endymion (1779) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 16, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I will review this one sometime over the next few days.
Hog Farm
Talk
19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Since I guess we're suppose to spot-check stuff on every GA review now: would you be willing to provide the brief quotes from the sources that support the following haphazardly selected statements:
Good work as usual. I'm always amazed that the British kept track of the dimensions to the half inch and the tonnage to the 94th of a ton while the Confederates had times they would purchase a civilian vessel for conversion and we don't even know what the original name of the vessel was, or when a ship was launched, or stuff like that. I guess the difference is that these vessels were expensive and built to last for decades, while the Confederates early in the war adopted the strategic vision of "hordes of floating junk". Hog Farm Talk 04:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
HMS Endymion (1779) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 16, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I will review this one sometime over the next few days.
Hog Farm
Talk
19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Since I guess we're suppose to spot-check stuff on every GA review now: would you be willing to provide the brief quotes from the sources that support the following haphazardly selected statements:
Good work as usual. I'm always amazed that the British kept track of the dimensions to the half inch and the tonnage to the 94th of a ton while the Confederates had times they would purchase a civilian vessel for conversion and we don't even know what the original name of the vessel was, or when a ship was launched, or stuff like that. I guess the difference is that these vessels were expensive and built to last for decades, while the Confederates early in the war adopted the strategic vision of "hordes of floating junk". Hog Farm Talk 04:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)