HMS Devonshire (39) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 30, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Devonshire (39) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Someone should probably disambiguate & write up previous ships by this name... but I don't know much of anything about them. - FZ 15:22, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
This section does not make sense. I would hazard a guess it has been auto translated from another source, but i propose removing if sense can't be made of it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.66.80 ( talk) 23:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
HMS Devonshire (39) is a typical example of numerous Royal Navy ship pages citing an incomplete pennant number. The Royal Navy pennant numbering system is explained on another Wiki page. Simply quoting the number alone is daft, as a number of ships would be using the number at any one time. I suspect HMS Devonshires full pennant to be C39 during WWII. Can someone correct this annoying problem please...............-- 91.5.150.231 ( talk) 23:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Euryalus ( talk · contribs) 06:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
1. Well written
Some minor points:
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated
Other
Thanks for your thorough review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The Honours Board for the ship is on display in the City Hall in Oslo Norway. My photograph taken in 2008. https://www.flickr.com/photos/bolckow/2342825103/in/album-72157604148944884/ Ian J. N. Stubbs ( talk) 08:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
HMS Devonshire (39) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 30, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Devonshire (39) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Someone should probably disambiguate & write up previous ships by this name... but I don't know much of anything about them. - FZ 15:22, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
This section does not make sense. I would hazard a guess it has been auto translated from another source, but i propose removing if sense can't be made of it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.66.80 ( talk) 23:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
HMS Devonshire (39) is a typical example of numerous Royal Navy ship pages citing an incomplete pennant number. The Royal Navy pennant numbering system is explained on another Wiki page. Simply quoting the number alone is daft, as a number of ships would be using the number at any one time. I suspect HMS Devonshires full pennant to be C39 during WWII. Can someone correct this annoying problem please...............-- 91.5.150.231 ( talk) 23:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Euryalus ( talk · contribs) 06:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
1. Well written
Some minor points:
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated
Other
Thanks for your thorough review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The Honours Board for the ship is on display in the City Hall in Oslo Norway. My photograph taken in 2008. https://www.flickr.com/photos/bolckow/2342825103/in/album-72157604148944884/ Ian J. N. Stubbs ( talk) 08:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)