![]() | HMS Collingwood (1882) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 12, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Collingwood (1882) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
This article says in the lede that the Admiral class was named for British Naval Commanders, except for one. Perhaps, but HMS Camperdown has a lede,
HMS Camperdown was a Victorian era battleship of the Royal Navy, named after Adam Duncan, 1st Viscount Duncan of Camperdown.
Therefore, it would seem that that ship was named for the Admiral, and not for the naval battle of Camperdown which became part of Adam Duncan's title after the victory. In other words, the lede may be wrong. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 15:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll be back in an hour.
JAG
UAR
10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Those were all of the minor issues I could find. Is it just me or did every Royal Navy ship collide with another back in those days LOL.
JAG
UAR 13:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for tackling these so promptly. As always, I'm happy to help you win the GA reviewing portion of this contest.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk)
21:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | HMS Collingwood (1882) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 12, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Collingwood (1882) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
This article says in the lede that the Admiral class was named for British Naval Commanders, except for one. Perhaps, but HMS Camperdown has a lede,
HMS Camperdown was a Victorian era battleship of the Royal Navy, named after Adam Duncan, 1st Viscount Duncan of Camperdown.
Therefore, it would seem that that ship was named for the Admiral, and not for the naval battle of Camperdown which became part of Adam Duncan's title after the victory. In other words, the lede may be wrong. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 15:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll be back in an hour.
JAG
UAR
10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Those were all of the minor issues I could find. Is it just me or did every Royal Navy ship collide with another back in those days LOL.
JAG
UAR 13:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for tackling these so promptly. As always, I'm happy to help you win the GA reviewing portion of this contest.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk)
21:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)