HMS Bonaventure (31) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 25, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Bonaventure (31) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Yoenit ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Correction: Italian torpedo boat "Vega", not "Vaga". Could you please correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.122.12.38 ( talk) 20:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Djmaschek ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
I plan to review this article. I will compile a list of issues. Please fix or argue your case for not fixing. Thanks. Djmaschek ( talk) 02:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Here are my comments. There will be a Review 2. Djmaschek ( talk) 03:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
GA class. The ship's career is very well written and no errors were found. I added years to a few dates. Djmaschek ( talk) 04:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:
(b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that could
reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
(c) it contains
no original research:
(d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
(b) it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
(b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
HMS Bonaventure (31) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 25, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Bonaventure (31) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Yoenit ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Correction: Italian torpedo boat "Vega", not "Vaga". Could you please correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.122.12.38 ( talk) 20:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Djmaschek ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
I plan to review this article. I will compile a list of issues. Please fix or argue your case for not fixing. Thanks. Djmaschek ( talk) 02:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Here are my comments. There will be a Review 2. Djmaschek ( talk) 03:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
GA class. The ship's career is very well written and no errors were found. I added years to a few dates. Djmaschek ( talk) 04:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:
(b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that could
reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
(c) it contains
no original research:
(d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
(b) it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
(b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions: