This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
WTF is "1070-1079"? The article says he ruled for thirteen years, so it's neither his life nor his reign.
-- Francis Schonken 10:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Said: Rursus 13:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
What's the logic behind writing the name in Norwegian? After all he was a Swedish king so why not Håkan the red? Narking ( talk) 21:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I will move the article to Håkan the Red if no-one is against it and can come up with a logical reason for not moving it. I don't see a reason for having his name in Norwegian. We don't have Olav for Swedish kings so why have Haakon? Narking ( talk) 19:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This cross-reference was removed with no other action taken to keep this important info:
I see no weighty reason to remove relevant information without adding it somewhere else. Restoring. SergeWoodzing ( talk) 12:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Hatnotes are indeed not to make controversial claims. I agree that the hatnote should stay removed. I do think the claim should be done in the text, in a NPOV way, with RS references.— OpenFuture ( talk) 20:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
It is my firm belief that established personal exonyms are not bound to certain persons but to the language at hand in general. In other words, it is always appropriate and useful to inform readers of English what established English versions of foreign personal names are. If king Karl I of Sweden is or has been totally unknown to English literature written by non-Swedes, it was/is certainly not incorrect to call him Charles anyway - applying the established English exonym i principle, not in person. -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 18:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Sources are king. Does a solid source refer to this person as Hacon? If yes, we could mention "Hacon" in the text. If no, we shouldn't. SergeWoodzing, has your "firm belief" influenced any other articles? If so, I would like to check them, and if necessary bring them back in line with WP:V. bobrayner ( talk) 13:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Håkan the Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.heimskringla.no/original/fornaldersagaene/hervararsaga.phpWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Håkan the Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
WTF is "1070-1079"? The article says he ruled for thirteen years, so it's neither his life nor his reign.
-- Francis Schonken 10:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Said: Rursus 13:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
What's the logic behind writing the name in Norwegian? After all he was a Swedish king so why not Håkan the red? Narking ( talk) 21:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I will move the article to Håkan the Red if no-one is against it and can come up with a logical reason for not moving it. I don't see a reason for having his name in Norwegian. We don't have Olav for Swedish kings so why have Haakon? Narking ( talk) 19:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This cross-reference was removed with no other action taken to keep this important info:
I see no weighty reason to remove relevant information without adding it somewhere else. Restoring. SergeWoodzing ( talk) 12:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Hatnotes are indeed not to make controversial claims. I agree that the hatnote should stay removed. I do think the claim should be done in the text, in a NPOV way, with RS references.— OpenFuture ( talk) 20:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
It is my firm belief that established personal exonyms are not bound to certain persons but to the language at hand in general. In other words, it is always appropriate and useful to inform readers of English what established English versions of foreign personal names are. If king Karl I of Sweden is or has been totally unknown to English literature written by non-Swedes, it was/is certainly not incorrect to call him Charles anyway - applying the established English exonym i principle, not in person. -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 18:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Sources are king. Does a solid source refer to this person as Hacon? If yes, we could mention "Hacon" in the text. If no, we shouldn't. SergeWoodzing, has your "firm belief" influenced any other articles? If so, I would like to check them, and if necessary bring them back in line with WP:V. bobrayner ( talk) 13:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Håkan the Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.heimskringla.no/original/fornaldersagaene/hervararsaga.phpWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Håkan the Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)