Guy Pallavicini has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 26, 2018. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Middle Ages: Crusades Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Crusades task force. Military history: Biography / Balkan / European / Italian / Medieval / Crusades This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force Italian military history task force (c. 500–present) Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Crusades task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:Guy Pallavicini/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges ( talk · contribs) 19:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• No DAB links Y
• No Dead links Y
• Images appropriately licensed Y (You may wish to add either File:Wappen der Familie Pallavicini.jpg or File:Pallavicini 3 - Tyroff AT.jpg.)

• Frankish Greece from 1204 to his May wish to add that the Greek called this period Frankokratia, could be done with parentheses.
  • Hmmm, sort of extraneous here. It is linked either way through "Frankish Greece". Constantine ✍ 10:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• whose part-owner Guy was suggest which was partially owned by Guy.
  • Fixed. Constantine ✍ 10:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• leaving his underage son Demetrius suggest infant rather than underage, since his article seems to indicate he was only two years old at the time, and "underaged" could, in the mind of a layman, mean up to 20 years old.
  • Good point, fixed. Constantine ✍ 10:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• @ Cplakidas: That is all my comments. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi Iazyges! I've fixed the points above, and gone through once more for minor issues. On the arms, I am hesitant to use 18th/19th-century arms for a 13th-century person, without knowing when and to which branch of the family they were conferred; I know that there is a tendency to include such in many similar articles, but that is incorrect practice. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 10:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply