This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Is this correct? If they are Nigerian patriots, perhaps the article should say so. Rumiton ( talk) 14:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor added an template:essay-like tag, [1] which says:
I don't see anything in it that looks like a personal reflection or essay. None of it is opinion - every line is a cited fact. I'm guessing that the tag may have been applied inadvertently. If there's no explanation I'll remove it. Will Beback talk 19:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
It has been suggested, as there were multiple pages leading to disparate "Maharaj Ji" entities, that a disambig page be created, which was done (3 other alternate spellings were changed to redirects, and their contents added). It has further been suggested on the Prem Rawat talk page that we also include the two possible "Guru Maharj Ji"'s on that page, thereby removing a small hatnote at the top of the Prem Rawat article (currently, searching in WP for "Guru Maharj Ji" takes you directly to Prem Rawat). I'm not expecting anyone to read this soon (based on the article activity), but just in case, does anyone here object to that? -- Maelefique (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Is this correct? If they are Nigerian patriots, perhaps the article should say so. Rumiton ( talk) 14:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor added an template:essay-like tag, [1] which says:
I don't see anything in it that looks like a personal reflection or essay. None of it is opinion - every line is a cited fact. I'm guessing that the tag may have been applied inadvertently. If there's no explanation I'll remove it. Will Beback talk 19:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
It has been suggested, as there were multiple pages leading to disparate "Maharaj Ji" entities, that a disambig page be created, which was done (3 other alternate spellings were changed to redirects, and their contents added). It has further been suggested on the Prem Rawat talk page that we also include the two possible "Guru Maharj Ji"'s on that page, thereby removing a small hatnote at the top of the Prem Rawat article (currently, searching in WP for "Guru Maharj Ji" takes you directly to Prem Rawat). I'm not expecting anyone to read this soon (based on the article activity), but just in case, does anyone here object to that? -- Maelefique (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)