I think this anime it's not seinen, it's Shōnen, I have changed it MrVicVega 16:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
its actually all of these: Drama, Mecha, Romance, Sci Fi, Shounen, Slice Of Life, Military Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I think Gunparade Orchestra must have a separate article since it bears no relation to March's storyline. E Wing ( talk) 16:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I can guess PBE might mean Phantom Beast Eraser, but nowhere in the page an explanation of the acronym is given.-- Abacos ( talk) 10:37, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
PBE is a massive, "pulse-emitting bomb" it is technically PEB but is stated as PBE.
Mokaiba11 (
talk)
10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
added episodes Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
revamp it, added some more stuff, and organized Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
added spin-off, revised some more areas, all episodes for spinoff are there with airted date...someone else can finsih adding them Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
FYI
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes The nature of the copyrighted work The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Mokaiba11 ( talk) 11:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
my edits are not an edit war if I am adding content to the artice, the one at fault for this edit war is Farix who keeps reverting to an old page without the new additions and he doesnt even write in the discussion. Mokaiba11 ( talk) 21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The article is full of material that is commented out and thus invisible to readers. Some of it has been this way for nearly 9 months. I can see from the talkpage that there has been a bit of argument over what should be removed and what should stay and I don't want to get into that, but commenting out large swaths of text for months-long periods is not an appropriate use of comments per WP:COMMENT. I'm moving the material here for the time being.
Block #1 (covering cast of Gunparade) |
---|
===== Cast =====
|
Block #2 (covering cast of Gunparade Orchestra) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
===== Cast =====
Section should be incorporated into characters
|
If this material can be re-incorporated into the article then that's fine, but if not it should be removed from the article and not simply commented out. - Thibbs ( talk) 23:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gunparade March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this anime it's not seinen, it's Shōnen, I have changed it MrVicVega 16:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
its actually all of these: Drama, Mecha, Romance, Sci Fi, Shounen, Slice Of Life, Military Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I think Gunparade Orchestra must have a separate article since it bears no relation to March's storyline. E Wing ( talk) 16:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I can guess PBE might mean Phantom Beast Eraser, but nowhere in the page an explanation of the acronym is given.-- Abacos ( talk) 10:37, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
PBE is a massive, "pulse-emitting bomb" it is technically PEB but is stated as PBE.
Mokaiba11 (
talk)
10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
added episodes Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
revamp it, added some more stuff, and organized Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
added spin-off, revised some more areas, all episodes for spinoff are there with airted date...someone else can finsih adding them Mokaiba11 ( talk) 10:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
FYI
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes The nature of the copyrighted work The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Mokaiba11 ( talk) 11:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
my edits are not an edit war if I am adding content to the artice, the one at fault for this edit war is Farix who keeps reverting to an old page without the new additions and he doesnt even write in the discussion. Mokaiba11 ( talk) 21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The article is full of material that is commented out and thus invisible to readers. Some of it has been this way for nearly 9 months. I can see from the talkpage that there has been a bit of argument over what should be removed and what should stay and I don't want to get into that, but commenting out large swaths of text for months-long periods is not an appropriate use of comments per WP:COMMENT. I'm moving the material here for the time being.
Block #1 (covering cast of Gunparade) |
---|
===== Cast =====
|
Block #2 (covering cast of Gunparade Orchestra) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
===== Cast =====
Section should be incorporated into characters
|
If this material can be re-incorporated into the article then that's fine, but if not it should be removed from the article and not simply commented out. - Thibbs ( talk) 23:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gunparade March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)