This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Jersey Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Revell case isn't really about NJ law, it is about national FOPA law. Mr. Revell had the option having the airline maintain possession of the luggage that contained the firearm. 108.18.73.68 ( talk) 09:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

While this is true, it is relevant in that NJ considers it illegal possession. There is no state law to protect anyone who checks in a firearm at a NJ airport. Case law also only currently applies to NJ since the case was decided at the third circuit and applies only to NJ airports. Ryan ( talk) 15:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I didn't remove/add anything, per se... just made it look nicer and more uniform/organized by outlining the sections and arranging them into nicer, uniform, groups. Skiendog ( talk) 08:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply