Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gulf Stream article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Gulf Stream was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Gulf Stream:
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Benjamin Franklin was copied or moved into Gulf Stream with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angerine01.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The heading of the article claims that there is consensus about the gulf stream and then doesn't provide a single citation for that claim. Claiming consensus feels a bit bold, but doing it without *any* citations seems like a huge mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CD01:F090:79CF:65B7:823A:16D1 ( talk) 01:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm unsure how to include this in the article but seems very important, please can someone check it and include?
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
The Gulf Stream's potential for renewable power generation is not significant enough to warrant its own section in this article, at least not at this point in time. The articles cited in this section are academically interesting (primarily the Yang et al. (2013) paper, none of the other references add much beyond this) but there is no significant/large-scale project underway to exploit the Gulf Stream as an energy source. A layperson reading this article may leave with the impression that this is a serious undertaking, when this is not the case. Scleractinian ( talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This was last reassessed in 2009. Quite a lot of research into this subject with regard to climate change has happened since and I don't think this article has completely kept up with it. There is also a [vague] template which needs to be addressed. PhotographyEdits ( talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
This article suggests it won’t. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gulf Stream article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Gulf Stream was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Gulf Stream:
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Benjamin Franklin was copied or moved into Gulf Stream with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angerine01.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The heading of the article claims that there is consensus about the gulf stream and then doesn't provide a single citation for that claim. Claiming consensus feels a bit bold, but doing it without *any* citations seems like a huge mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CD01:F090:79CF:65B7:823A:16D1 ( talk) 01:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm unsure how to include this in the article but seems very important, please can someone check it and include?
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
The Gulf Stream's potential for renewable power generation is not significant enough to warrant its own section in this article, at least not at this point in time. The articles cited in this section are academically interesting (primarily the Yang et al. (2013) paper, none of the other references add much beyond this) but there is no significant/large-scale project underway to exploit the Gulf Stream as an energy source. A layperson reading this article may leave with the impression that this is a serious undertaking, when this is not the case. Scleractinian ( talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This was last reassessed in 2009. Quite a lot of research into this subject with regard to climate change has happened since and I don't think this article has completely kept up with it. There is also a [vague] template which needs to be addressed. PhotographyEdits ( talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
This article suggests it won’t. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)