This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gulbarg Society massacre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 28, 2013 and February 28, 2016. |
How can someone be hacked to death *and* burned alive? Tsuguya ( talk) 16:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
the first para ended as follows:
"On March 2011 Sessions Court Judge H A Shah considering the case as "rarest of rare" pronounced death penalty for 71 out of 104 convicted in the case while 33 others were sentenced to life imprisonment. Later some of the accused go on Supreme Court of India for review application."
which I have removed as there is no citation, and a google search shows that the case was put on hold by the supreme court after the public prosecutor resigned in 2010 . I doubt a simple google would not lead to a news article for such a case featuring prominently in the national media, further india's justice system is too slow to get a judgement in under a year after a hold on the trial.
75.49.251.113 ( talk) 22:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
This page contains potentially derogatory material, by quoting the number of deaths on the basis of religion. This information shouldn't be shown directly Sachinndaas ( talk) 02:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
This user has been adding wrong information on wiki pages that the case has been reopened while merely a protest petition has been accepted. Rather I guess the investigation was never closed as the case is still pending, reopening would be a far off thing then. Arguendo, even if the case were so, the case has not been reopned. It is in investigation since 2004. I had pointed out this to him earlier as well. I request him not to carry on disruptive edits.-- Mohit Singh ( talk) 07:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gulbarg Society massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gulbarg Society massacre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 28, 2013 and February 28, 2016. |
How can someone be hacked to death *and* burned alive? Tsuguya ( talk) 16:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
the first para ended as follows:
"On March 2011 Sessions Court Judge H A Shah considering the case as "rarest of rare" pronounced death penalty for 71 out of 104 convicted in the case while 33 others were sentenced to life imprisonment. Later some of the accused go on Supreme Court of India for review application."
which I have removed as there is no citation, and a google search shows that the case was put on hold by the supreme court after the public prosecutor resigned in 2010 . I doubt a simple google would not lead to a news article for such a case featuring prominently in the national media, further india's justice system is too slow to get a judgement in under a year after a hold on the trial.
75.49.251.113 ( talk) 22:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
This page contains potentially derogatory material, by quoting the number of deaths on the basis of religion. This information shouldn't be shown directly Sachinndaas ( talk) 02:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
This user has been adding wrong information on wiki pages that the case has been reopened while merely a protest petition has been accepted. Rather I guess the investigation was never closed as the case is still pending, reopening would be a far off thing then. Arguendo, even if the case were so, the case has not been reopned. It is in investigation since 2004. I had pointed out this to him earlier as well. I request him not to carry on disruptive edits.-- Mohit Singh ( talk) 07:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gulbarg Society massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)