This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Oops, sorry!
I think "It's Alright, It's OK" should get it's own page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.57.101 ( talk) 22:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The info repeat about the single, it's important, later when the single will be a charted single and get own page. Juanacho( talk) 19:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The album doesn't come out in Mexico in April, this fact is FALSE. Sarah, the administrator from AshleyTisdale.com, confirmed it's false, the album doesn't come out in April anyway and anywhere!!! Please, someone take off this information, because when I took it off, someone replaces it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceland-X ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Why were the Japanese edition version bonus tracks removed from the track listing? They were cited. Skawt ( talk) 11:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
The leaked song, If my Life was a Movie, will be on Guilty Pleasure as bonus track on a special or standard edition of another country? pedro joão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Many reviews are mocking the album cover [1] Nbeau1989 ( talk) 22:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
References
I have been trying to add a professional review from http://www.teentoday.co.uk/article/ashley-tisdale-guilty-pleasure/; however, user Nbeau1989 keeps deleting it with claims like 'not professional reviews done by gossip magazines and teenage publications are not un-bias' and 'barely known gossip magazine and has no credibility to it either'. Firstly, a quick perusal of the website shows it carries numerous other album reviews all written in a professional style with an editorially neutral point of view, and other reviews from the website are featured on Wikipedia album pages. Nbeau1989's claims that it is a 'gossip magazine' are untrue because teentoday.co.uk is not a gossip magazine, it is a legitimate website! The WikiPedia: WikiProject Albums page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Albums#Professional_reviews) states 'Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)' and I think the teentoday.co.uk review complies with this. The WikiProject Albums article also states that articles should have ten reviews - and given that there are thus far relatively few reviews for this album, and the majority of them are negative, I think that the teentoday.co.uk review provides a nice balance, as well as making the article more exhaustive and supporting the article's statement that reviews have been 'mixed' - some have been negative, but others have been positive. Checking Nbeau1989's editing history, it appears his main reason for deleting the review is because it is a positive review of Tisdale and all his edits have been to include negative information. What does everyone else think? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.48.24 ( talk) 04:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Can i ask why when we already have nearly 6! reviews and teentoday is not even that well known it does not have it's own page to link to on wikipedia and me deleting it was not personal vendetta against anyone or anything i just personaly DONT think it should be in there do you really want to add every single review written about this album to be placed there even ones from lil blog's that dont even have a page on here or would you rather have pages where people can RELATE to and know that it is a trusted review Nbeau1989 ( talk) 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm curious to know why "What If" doesn't have it's own page and "Overrated" does. Is there a difference in criteria between the two? 67.169.148.40 ( talk) 00:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I think Masquerade and Hot Mess needs to have a page here in Wikipedia cause many people including me are searching and what's to find out... so please..! 67.169.148.40 ( talk) 19:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
i agree both songs should not get there own page unless they chart on numrous charts around the world rather then any single specific one Nbeau1989 ( talk) 07:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
The admin of Ashley Tisdale's official boards - managed by Warner Bros. Records - has posted that "Crank It Up" is the official second single and "Masquerade" will be a promotional single, to be released before "Crank It Up". Warner has not posted anything on Tisdale's website but I managed to create a account on Tisdale's forum and I can tell you that's correct. But since it has been confirmed and there's no other reliable source, I think the link to the official board should be used until a new reference becomes available. Other opinions? Decodet ( talk) 18:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
The Masquerade promo single is on Spotify, but all the other promo singles aren't. So, Is Masquerade an official single??-- 84.77.129.250 ( talk) 14:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
The release section is in desperate need of a cleanup ! 11coolguy12 ( talk) 11:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
]This article didn't specify about the iTunes Countdown that was released during the album's promotion. I searched for sources but all I could find was this
link (which doesn't work anymore) and other forums and blogs but those aren't considered as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards.
I want to ask you guys to find a reliable source that justifies this. I can't find a reliable site that specifies this anymore. Please?
Pedro João
talk
20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/09/25/new-single-crank-it-international-news{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/355577{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356916{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/357761{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/04/04/ashleys-stern-music-interview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/05/13/ashley-checks-her-radio-tour{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/04/10/its-alright-its-ok-premiere{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/354734{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356201{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356209{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356687{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356774{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/357308{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/23/ashleys-upcoming-tv-appearances{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/08/20/watch-ashley-americas-got-talent{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/10/aol-sessions-preview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/15/walmart-soundcheck-preview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/09/25/new-single-crank-it-international-newsWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Oops, sorry!
I think "It's Alright, It's OK" should get it's own page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.57.101 ( talk) 22:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The info repeat about the single, it's important, later when the single will be a charted single and get own page. Juanacho( talk) 19:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The album doesn't come out in Mexico in April, this fact is FALSE. Sarah, the administrator from AshleyTisdale.com, confirmed it's false, the album doesn't come out in April anyway and anywhere!!! Please, someone take off this information, because when I took it off, someone replaces it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceland-X ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Why were the Japanese edition version bonus tracks removed from the track listing? They were cited. Skawt ( talk) 11:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
The leaked song, If my Life was a Movie, will be on Guilty Pleasure as bonus track on a special or standard edition of another country? pedro joão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Many reviews are mocking the album cover [1] Nbeau1989 ( talk) 22:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
References
I have been trying to add a professional review from http://www.teentoday.co.uk/article/ashley-tisdale-guilty-pleasure/; however, user Nbeau1989 keeps deleting it with claims like 'not professional reviews done by gossip magazines and teenage publications are not un-bias' and 'barely known gossip magazine and has no credibility to it either'. Firstly, a quick perusal of the website shows it carries numerous other album reviews all written in a professional style with an editorially neutral point of view, and other reviews from the website are featured on Wikipedia album pages. Nbeau1989's claims that it is a 'gossip magazine' are untrue because teentoday.co.uk is not a gossip magazine, it is a legitimate website! The WikiPedia: WikiProject Albums page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Albums#Professional_reviews) states 'Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)' and I think the teentoday.co.uk review complies with this. The WikiProject Albums article also states that articles should have ten reviews - and given that there are thus far relatively few reviews for this album, and the majority of them are negative, I think that the teentoday.co.uk review provides a nice balance, as well as making the article more exhaustive and supporting the article's statement that reviews have been 'mixed' - some have been negative, but others have been positive. Checking Nbeau1989's editing history, it appears his main reason for deleting the review is because it is a positive review of Tisdale and all his edits have been to include negative information. What does everyone else think? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.48.24 ( talk) 04:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Can i ask why when we already have nearly 6! reviews and teentoday is not even that well known it does not have it's own page to link to on wikipedia and me deleting it was not personal vendetta against anyone or anything i just personaly DONT think it should be in there do you really want to add every single review written about this album to be placed there even ones from lil blog's that dont even have a page on here or would you rather have pages where people can RELATE to and know that it is a trusted review Nbeau1989 ( talk) 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm curious to know why "What If" doesn't have it's own page and "Overrated" does. Is there a difference in criteria between the two? 67.169.148.40 ( talk) 00:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I think Masquerade and Hot Mess needs to have a page here in Wikipedia cause many people including me are searching and what's to find out... so please..! 67.169.148.40 ( talk) 19:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
i agree both songs should not get there own page unless they chart on numrous charts around the world rather then any single specific one Nbeau1989 ( talk) 07:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
The admin of Ashley Tisdale's official boards - managed by Warner Bros. Records - has posted that "Crank It Up" is the official second single and "Masquerade" will be a promotional single, to be released before "Crank It Up". Warner has not posted anything on Tisdale's website but I managed to create a account on Tisdale's forum and I can tell you that's correct. But since it has been confirmed and there's no other reliable source, I think the link to the official board should be used until a new reference becomes available. Other opinions? Decodet ( talk) 18:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
The Masquerade promo single is on Spotify, but all the other promo singles aren't. So, Is Masquerade an official single??-- 84.77.129.250 ( talk) 14:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
The release section is in desperate need of a cleanup ! 11coolguy12 ( talk) 11:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
]This article didn't specify about the iTunes Countdown that was released during the album's promotion. I searched for sources but all I could find was this
link (which doesn't work anymore) and other forums and blogs but those aren't considered as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards.
I want to ask you guys to find a reliable source that justifies this. I can't find a reliable site that specifies this anymore. Please?
Pedro João
talk
20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/09/25/new-single-crank-it-international-news{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/355577{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356916{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/357761{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/04/04/ashleys-stern-music-interview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/05/13/ashley-checks-her-radio-tour{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/04/10/its-alright-its-ok-premiere{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/354734{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356201{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356209{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356687{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/356774{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/node/357308{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/23/ashleys-upcoming-tv-appearances{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/08/20/watch-ashley-americas-got-talent{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/10/aol-sessions-preview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/07/15/walmart-soundcheck-preview{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/news/2009/09/25/new-single-crank-it-international-newsWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)