![]() | Guadeloupe amazon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 28, 2021. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My Latin dictionary has viola "violet", or this book mentions violacea too. I don't have that bird book, only what I seen on google. There was this source I used for Cortinarius violaceus too. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guadeloupe amazon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Since this parrot was not even confirmed to be a real species, I argue it should be removed from the categories relating to extinction until a non-IUCN source confirms its existence. Riding on just one source isn't smart Ddum5347 ( talk) 21:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Festive amazon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Guadeloupe amazon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 28, 2021. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My Latin dictionary has viola "violet", or this book mentions violacea too. I don't have that bird book, only what I seen on google. There was this source I used for Cortinarius violaceus too. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guadeloupe amazon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Since this parrot was not even confirmed to be a real species, I argue it should be removed from the categories relating to extinction until a non-IUCN source confirms its existence. Riding on just one source isn't smart Ddum5347 ( talk) 21:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Festive amazon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)