This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Every specification of the Tiger with the upgraded engines, makes no mention of weights, centers of gravity, or any other facts? The J-79 weighed several hundred pounds more? "Janes" is not a definitive source. Can we please correct this?
69.46.58.93 (
talk)
01:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Move?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
F11F was the US Navy designation for the Tiger NOT the Super Tiger which was F11F-1F, a bit confusing but a lot less confusing than calling Super Tigers Tigers in the same article title
Petebutt (
talk)
22:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)reply
No. To my knowledge, F-11B was never official, as it was out of all competitions by the time of the McNamara redesignations of 1962. Had the US Navy ordered the Super Tiger into production, it would probably had been designated F12F. -
BilCat (
talk)
23:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Every specification of the Tiger with the upgraded engines, makes no mention of weights, centers of gravity, or any other facts? The J-79 weighed several hundred pounds more? "Janes" is not a definitive source. Can we please correct this?
69.46.58.93 (
talk)
01:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Move?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
F11F was the US Navy designation for the Tiger NOT the Super Tiger which was F11F-1F, a bit confusing but a lot less confusing than calling Super Tigers Tigers in the same article title
Petebutt (
talk)
22:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)reply
No. To my knowledge, F-11B was never official, as it was out of all competitions by the time of the McNamara redesignations of 1962. Had the US Navy ordered the Super Tiger into production, it would probably had been designated F12F. -
BilCat (
talk)
23:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.