This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Griffith (name) was copied or moved into Gruffudd with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Gruffudd → Gruffydd – Per WP:REDUNDANTFORK & WP:COMMONNAME. — LlywelynII 12:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Gruffydd. — LlywelynII 12:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
{{
Rfc|style|lang|soc|bio}}
As the original merge suggestion attracted no salient comments here and only two at the other page, with a 50/50 split, I'm opening an RfC, and suggesting a merge in the other direction, to the better-developed page. The Gruffudd spelling appears to be more common today, is more familiar to more readers because of
Ioan Gruffudd, and produces significantly more Google hits. We definitely do not need a bunch of
WP:REDUNDANTFORKs on every possible spelling of this name (or any name), especially when most of it's just disambiguation "un-content" instead of real content, spelling varies widely even for the same historical subjects, there are many more such variants, and none of them are likely possible to develop into a real and properly sourced article on the name without combining them. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Most of the content of three sections of Griffith (name), "Evolution and history", "Variants", and "Hypocoristic forms", really pertain to Gruffudd/Gruffydd, and should merge into this article, as they pre-date the existence of the Anglicisation Griffith[s]. All that need be left behind at Griffith (name) of this material is a summary, and any material pertaining explicitly to the late, Anglicised variant (e.g. "Griff" has a hypocorism). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Done
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Griffith (name) was copied or moved into Gruffudd with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Gruffudd → Gruffydd – Per WP:REDUNDANTFORK & WP:COMMONNAME. — LlywelynII 12:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Gruffydd. — LlywelynII 12:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
{{
Rfc|style|lang|soc|bio}}
As the original merge suggestion attracted no salient comments here and only two at the other page, with a 50/50 split, I'm opening an RfC, and suggesting a merge in the other direction, to the better-developed page. The Gruffudd spelling appears to be more common today, is more familiar to more readers because of
Ioan Gruffudd, and produces significantly more Google hits. We definitely do not need a bunch of
WP:REDUNDANTFORKs on every possible spelling of this name (or any name), especially when most of it's just disambiguation "un-content" instead of real content, spelling varies widely even for the same historical subjects, there are many more such variants, and none of them are likely possible to develop into a real and properly sourced article on the name without combining them. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Most of the content of three sections of Griffith (name), "Evolution and history", "Variants", and "Hypocoristic forms", really pertain to Gruffudd/Gruffydd, and should merge into this article, as they pre-date the existence of the Anglicisation Griffith[s]. All that need be left behind at Griffith (name) of this material is a summary, and any material pertaining explicitly to the late, Anglicised variant (e.g. "Griff" has a hypocorism). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Done