PASS This article appears to satisfy the
GA criteria. Solidly written, with detailed citations and a broad discussion of the case. I'm a little concerned that the introduction is a bit dense, providing more information than is needed in an overview (and which is made redundant by the rest of the article) so I would encourage some additional simplification per
WP:LEAD. Also consider adding an infobox. Otherwise, great job!
Vicenarian (
talk)
00:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)reply
PASS This article appears to satisfy the
GA criteria. Solidly written, with detailed citations and a broad discussion of the case. I'm a little concerned that the introduction is a bit dense, providing more information than is needed in an overview (and which is made redundant by the rest of the article) so I would encourage some additional simplification per
WP:LEAD. Also consider adding an infobox. Otherwise, great job!
Vicenarian (
talk)
00:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)reply