This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Here are some articles with a lot of economic considerations which I would add now if my schedule wasn't completely smashed this week:
https://gawg.info/files/papers/IRENA20a.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243512200410X
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acacb5
https://www.hydrogenfuelnews.com/green-hydrogen-technology-cheap/8559025/
Maybe someone else can add the salient points? Sandizer ( talk) 14:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Difficult to comprehend. Need someone with knowledge in this area who can break it down and make the language simpler. Eatthecrow ( talk) 16:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The first sentence of the lead currently says green hydrogen is generated from either " renewable energy [1] or low-carbon power. [2]" This fails verification - the cited source for low-carbon power actually says that green H2 uses electricity generated from renewables.
The sentence doesn't align with any definition I've seen. The narrow, most-commonly-used definition excludes non-renewable power sources. The broader, less-used definition includes hydrogen generated from low-carbon power, but it also includes things like hydrogen produced by reforming landfill gas or even (some would argue) from fossil gas with CCS. I plan to change this sentence to match the narrow definition, which is now well-cited in the article and supported by additional authoritative sources as described above. Since the main purpose of the first sentence is to tell the reader what the article is about and the article does seem to be about the narrow meaning, I think this is the only definition that belongs in the lead. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 00:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
References
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Here are some articles with a lot of economic considerations which I would add now if my schedule wasn't completely smashed this week:
https://gawg.info/files/papers/IRENA20a.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243512200410X
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acacb5
https://www.hydrogenfuelnews.com/green-hydrogen-technology-cheap/8559025/
Maybe someone else can add the salient points? Sandizer ( talk) 14:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Difficult to comprehend. Need someone with knowledge in this area who can break it down and make the language simpler. Eatthecrow ( talk) 16:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The first sentence of the lead currently says green hydrogen is generated from either " renewable energy [1] or low-carbon power. [2]" This fails verification - the cited source for low-carbon power actually says that green H2 uses electricity generated from renewables.
The sentence doesn't align with any definition I've seen. The narrow, most-commonly-used definition excludes non-renewable power sources. The broader, less-used definition includes hydrogen generated from low-carbon power, but it also includes things like hydrogen produced by reforming landfill gas or even (some would argue) from fossil gas with CCS. I plan to change this sentence to match the narrow definition, which is now well-cited in the article and supported by additional authoritative sources as described above. Since the main purpose of the first sentence is to tell the reader what the article is about and the article does seem to be about the narrow meaning, I think this is the only definition that belongs in the lead. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 00:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
References