![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Firstly, the Guardian Article does not state that Mr Eliasch is a "Green Grabber", so Wikipedia is inferring that Mr Eliasch is a "Green Grabber". Secondly, the entire topic is essentially based on a single newspaper article which did not gain any traction. That is not responsible reporting. Wikipedia may be an encyclopedia but it also has to be verifiable and accurate. Why doesn't Wikipedia write about the other individuals mentioned in the article? Why doesn't Wikipedia go to the Cool Earth Website? If Wikipedia copied the Guardian article in good faith, it would mention every individual mentioned in the article. The topic has been reported in malicious faith and without foundation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.138.33.132 ( talk) 03:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2024 and 15 March 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Graciebook (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Tieot.
— Assignment last updated by Juniper37 ( talk) 18:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
In the next couple weeks, I will be revising and editing this article for an energy and sustainability course project. I would appreciate any feedback on my proposed edits, which I will be working on in my user sandbox. So far, my planned changes to the article include:
Thanks! graciebook Graciebook ( talk) 01:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Firstly, the Guardian Article does not state that Mr Eliasch is a "Green Grabber", so Wikipedia is inferring that Mr Eliasch is a "Green Grabber". Secondly, the entire topic is essentially based on a single newspaper article which did not gain any traction. That is not responsible reporting. Wikipedia may be an encyclopedia but it also has to be verifiable and accurate. Why doesn't Wikipedia write about the other individuals mentioned in the article? Why doesn't Wikipedia go to the Cool Earth Website? If Wikipedia copied the Guardian article in good faith, it would mention every individual mentioned in the article. The topic has been reported in malicious faith and without foundation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.138.33.132 ( talk) 03:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2024 and 15 March 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Graciebook (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Tieot.
— Assignment last updated by Juniper37 ( talk) 18:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
In the next couple weeks, I will be revising and editing this article for an energy and sustainability course project. I would appreciate any feedback on my proposed edits, which I will be working on in my user sandbox. So far, my planned changes to the article include:
Thanks! graciebook Graciebook ( talk) 01:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)