The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I will complete this review within a week. - Riley1012 ( talk) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
No MOS issues
2. Verifiable The reference layout is good. The article is well-sourced by reliable sources. A spot check of references looks good. Copyvio check looks good.
3. Broad The article is broad in its coverage of both the song selection and Eurovision contests.
4. Neutral The article is neutral.
5. Stable The edit history shows the article is stable.
6. Illustrated Images are all free, relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
@ Grk1011: There are only a few prose issues to correct. The rest of the article looks ready for GA status. - Riley1012 ( talk) 22:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I will complete this review within a week. - Riley1012 ( talk) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
No MOS issues
2. Verifiable The reference layout is good. The article is well-sourced by reliable sources. A spot check of references looks good. Copyvio check looks good.
3. Broad The article is broad in its coverage of both the song selection and Eurovision contests.
4. Neutral The article is neutral.
5. Stable The edit history shows the article is stable.
6. Illustrated Images are all free, relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
@ Grk1011: There are only a few prose issues to correct. The rest of the article looks ready for GA status. - Riley1012 ( talk) 22:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)