![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added the contradiction tag because these 2 sentences are in the first paragraph: "Farmers sometimes consider them pests, because they will eat almost any crop plant." "They do not eat most crop plants, but they will eat brassicas (cabbage, and baby chard and bok choi) if very hungry soybean leaves."
I do not know which one is correct, so could someone with knowledge of this animal's behaviour cleanup the first paragraph to clarify the contradiction? thanks. Davelapo555 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
This article has quite a few inaccuracies and unsupported statements and really needs a rewrite. I've done a little, but a good bit more needs doing. To summarise:
If the food claims cannot be supported, it may be that a discussion of folk beliefs about benefits of rhea products might be appropriate.-- Richard New Forest 09:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I read in the diet section that their diet is "mainly..." one thing, but "particularly..." something entirely different. This makes no sense linguistically and should be cleaned up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.78.27.10 ( talk) 00:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Why the author of "Family Rheidae" section in "Handbook of Birds of the World" is named Francesc Jutglar, when indeed he is A. Folch? Jutglar is the artist of this book. I have that volume.-- Vicpeters ( talk) 19:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
The article for the Andean Vulture claims it is the largest bird in South America, this article claims the greater rhea is the largest bird... which one is right? 66.25.254.123 ( talk) 21:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greater rhea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ararajuba.org.br/sbo/ararajuba/artigos/Volume143/ara143not3.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added the contradiction tag because these 2 sentences are in the first paragraph: "Farmers sometimes consider them pests, because they will eat almost any crop plant." "They do not eat most crop plants, but they will eat brassicas (cabbage, and baby chard and bok choi) if very hungry soybean leaves."
I do not know which one is correct, so could someone with knowledge of this animal's behaviour cleanup the first paragraph to clarify the contradiction? thanks. Davelapo555 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
This article has quite a few inaccuracies and unsupported statements and really needs a rewrite. I've done a little, but a good bit more needs doing. To summarise:
If the food claims cannot be supported, it may be that a discussion of folk beliefs about benefits of rhea products might be appropriate.-- Richard New Forest 09:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I read in the diet section that their diet is "mainly..." one thing, but "particularly..." something entirely different. This makes no sense linguistically and should be cleaned up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.78.27.10 ( talk) 00:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Why the author of "Family Rheidae" section in "Handbook of Birds of the World" is named Francesc Jutglar, when indeed he is A. Folch? Jutglar is the artist of this book. I have that volume.-- Vicpeters ( talk) 19:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
The article for the Andean Vulture claims it is the largest bird in South America, this article claims the greater rhea is the largest bird... which one is right? 66.25.254.123 ( talk) 21:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greater rhea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ararajuba.org.br/sbo/ararajuba/artigos/Volume143/ara143not3.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)