Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 18:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
The image:
File:Sonning2.jpg is public domain as its copyright has expired rather than for the current reason. Done --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
21:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The images:
File:GWR_4038_on_Cornish_Riviera_Express.jpg and
File:GWR_bus_AF84_on_Helston_service.jpg need their authorship correcting. Done
Geof Sheppard (
talk)
12:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
The image:
File:Railway bridge Maidenhead.jpeg could do with a better tag for its status, but its a minor issue. I'm wrong, this looks OK actually. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
21:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I need a chance to go through the manual of style criteria in more detail and it needs a few more sources so I'm putting it on hold for now. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
19:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Now passed. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 17:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
For me that GW branch lines are ignored is a fatal reason against this being a Good Article. That some lines were not 100% GW is not a valid reason for their omission.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I'll check tomorrow, and I'll also take another look at the sourcing, it seems you've been busy :). -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 07:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment - not that I would necessarily fail this for GA, but from the little I have read about this railway line, it was considered a major engineering achievement at the time, but there is no sense of this in the article. I might have some more to say about this later when I've had time to check back on my references. Gatoclass ( talk) 17:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I've been through the references and the following references are missing their full details and just seem to give a book with no further details: 1, 2, 4, 5, 13, 19, 20, 23, 25, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 66, 68, 69, 70, 72, 74, 75, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 89 and 93. If you guys want a second opinion on whether I'm being reasonable to challenge this feel free - as it is a lot of work to fix this. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 13:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
For clarity the two additional citations are for the speed of the Cheltenham Spa Express and the existence of at least the Torbay Express if not the Bristolian, as it isn't clear that it didn't start at Bristol (though I'll pass the article without the latter sourced). -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 14:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 18:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
The image:
File:Sonning2.jpg is public domain as its copyright has expired rather than for the current reason. Done --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
21:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The images:
File:GWR_4038_on_Cornish_Riviera_Express.jpg and
File:GWR_bus_AF84_on_Helston_service.jpg need their authorship correcting. Done
Geof Sheppard (
talk)
12:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
The image:
File:Railway bridge Maidenhead.jpeg could do with a better tag for its status, but its a minor issue. I'm wrong, this looks OK actually. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
21:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I need a chance to go through the manual of style criteria in more detail and it needs a few more sources so I'm putting it on hold for now. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
19:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Now passed. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 17:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
For me that GW branch lines are ignored is a fatal reason against this being a Good Article. That some lines were not 100% GW is not a valid reason for their omission.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I'll check tomorrow, and I'll also take another look at the sourcing, it seems you've been busy :). -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 07:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment - not that I would necessarily fail this for GA, but from the little I have read about this railway line, it was considered a major engineering achievement at the time, but there is no sense of this in the article. I might have some more to say about this later when I've had time to check back on my references. Gatoclass ( talk) 17:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I've been through the references and the following references are missing their full details and just seem to give a book with no further details: 1, 2, 4, 5, 13, 19, 20, 23, 25, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 66, 68, 69, 70, 72, 74, 75, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 89 and 93. If you guys want a second opinion on whether I'm being reasonable to challenge this feel free - as it is a lot of work to fix this. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 13:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
For clarity the two additional citations are for the speed of the Cheltenham Spa Express and the existence of at least the Torbay Express if not the Bristolian, as it isn't clear that it didn't start at Bristol (though I'll pass the article without the latter sourced). -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 14:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)