This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Great Reset article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Great Reset appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 December 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Created by Username6892 ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Disclaimer, I did accept this article at AfC, but I am not a significant contributor. I c/ed the hooks to rm improper italics. I think ALT0 is best. ( t · c) buidhe 05:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency WAR COMMUNISM IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY By ANDREAS MALM
ISBN 9781839762154
"In Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency, leading environmental thinker, Andreas Malm demands that this war-footing state should be applied on a permanent basis to the ongoing climate front line. He offers proposals on how the climate movement should use this present emergency to make that case. There can be no excuse for inaction any longer."
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/667901/corona-climate-chronic-emergency-by-andreas-malm/
Here's a book from a major publishing house which is germane to the topic. Not sure how editors would like to spin this. Thanks.
Does no one find it bizarre that there's no criticism section, but a large "conspiracy theory" section? Wikipedia has a credibility problem for EXACTLY this reason. Anything that dares question the narrative must be debunked as conspiracy, and only conspiracy. This undue weight suggests the GR is accepted, and not widely criticised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.28.113 ( talk) 12:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Forum discussion about Wikipedia editors
|
---|
|
The article is a well founded criticism of The Great Reset agenda, and it makes really good points. So I dont understand who, and why was it decided to file it under Conspiracy Theory? Criticizing it now is conspiracy theory? Do you really want to live in a world where some topics are beyond reproach? 2A03:4B80:A036:2A60:4908:12C9:E9AE:44C0 ( talk) 07:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
I feel like this topic has become a bit confused. For example, someone earlier in the talk page (intentions unknown, but their point is actually a valid one) mentioned that there's no "criticism" section on this article, only "conspiracy theories". I feel like it'd be better if this page was dedicated to mostly rational discussion (praise and criticism, mindful of WP:DUE), based on the actual proposal, and then a "conspiracy theory" section with a sentence or two which links to another article, describing the conspiracy smoothie based on it. MarkiPoli ( talk) 07:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Great Reset article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Great Reset appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 December 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Created by Username6892 ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Disclaimer, I did accept this article at AfC, but I am not a significant contributor. I c/ed the hooks to rm improper italics. I think ALT0 is best. ( t · c) buidhe 05:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency WAR COMMUNISM IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY By ANDREAS MALM
ISBN 9781839762154
"In Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency, leading environmental thinker, Andreas Malm demands that this war-footing state should be applied on a permanent basis to the ongoing climate front line. He offers proposals on how the climate movement should use this present emergency to make that case. There can be no excuse for inaction any longer."
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/667901/corona-climate-chronic-emergency-by-andreas-malm/
Here's a book from a major publishing house which is germane to the topic. Not sure how editors would like to spin this. Thanks.
Does no one find it bizarre that there's no criticism section, but a large "conspiracy theory" section? Wikipedia has a credibility problem for EXACTLY this reason. Anything that dares question the narrative must be debunked as conspiracy, and only conspiracy. This undue weight suggests the GR is accepted, and not widely criticised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.28.113 ( talk) 12:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Forum discussion about Wikipedia editors
|
---|
|
The article is a well founded criticism of The Great Reset agenda, and it makes really good points. So I dont understand who, and why was it decided to file it under Conspiracy Theory? Criticizing it now is conspiracy theory? Do you really want to live in a world where some topics are beyond reproach? 2A03:4B80:A036:2A60:4908:12C9:E9AE:44C0 ( talk) 07:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
I feel like this topic has become a bit confused. For example, someone earlier in the talk page (intentions unknown, but their point is actually a valid one) mentioned that there's no "criticism" section on this article, only "conspiracy theories". I feel like it'd be better if this page was dedicated to mostly rational discussion (praise and criticism, mindful of WP:DUE), based on the actual proposal, and then a "conspiracy theory" section with a sentence or two which links to another article, describing the conspiracy smoothie based on it. MarkiPoli ( talk) 07:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)